ORIGINAL ARTICLE

TLR2 variants and Helicobacter pylori: revisiting a controversial link

Duygu Kirkika,b, Sevgi Demirciogluc and Sevgi Kalkanli Taşa

aDepartment of Immunology, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye; bDepartment of Medical Biology, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye; cDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkiye

ABSTRACT

Objective: Although polymorphisms in the Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) gene have been proposed as host genetic factors influencing susceptibility to Helicobacter pylori infection, existing data remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify whether two common variants – rs3804099 and del –196 to –174 – contribute to infection risk across diverse populations.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (up to January 2025) identified eligible case–control studies examining the association between TLR2 polymorphisms and H. pylori infection. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity were assessed according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Results: Ten studies comprising 4,521 subjects were included. Pooled analyses under allelic, dominant, recessive, homozygous, and heterozygous models revealed no significant association between either rs3804099 or del –196 to –174 polymorphisms and infection risk. Substantial inter-study heterogeneity was observed, particularly for rs3804099, but sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of pooled results.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis refutes a consistent genetic association between TLR2 rs3804099 or del –196 to –174 polymorphisms and H. pylori infection. The findings suggest that host innate immunity variability alone does not explain differences in infection susceptibility among populations. Future studies integrating bacterial virulence genotypes and host immunogenetic profiles are warranted to delineate population-specific risk mechanisms.

KEYWORDS: TLR2; Helicobacter pylori; del –196 to –174; meta-analysis; random-effects model

 

Citation: UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2025, 130, e13533; http://dx.doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v130.13533

Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Upsala Medical Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 20 October 2025; Revised: 29 October 2025; Accepted: 30 October 2025; Published: 22 December 2025

Competing interests and funding: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
No financial support, sponsorship, or writing assistance was received during the preparation of this manuscript.

CONTACT: Duygu Kırkık duygu.kirkik@sbu.edu.tr

 

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a Gram-negative, spiral-shaped, microaerophilic bacterium that colonizes the human gastric epithelium, establishing chronic infection in more than 50% of the global population (1). Although many infected individuals remain asymptomatic, H. pylori are etiologically linked to several gastrointestinal pathologies, including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (25). Epidemiological evidence suggests that H. pylori infection contributes to the pathogenesis of gastric cancer through a multistep process involving chronic inflammation, gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia (6, 7).

The clinical heterogeneity observed among H. pylori-infected individuals can be attributed to differences in bacterial virulence factors (such as CagA and VacA), environmental exposures (diet, smoking, hygiene), and host genetic factors (810). One of the most critical aspects of host defense against H. pylori is the innate immune system, particularly through pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (11). TLRs recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and initiate signaling cascades that result in the activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), triggering the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and macrophage inflammatory proteins (12). Among these receptors, TLR2 has been shown to play a prominent role in the immune response to H. pylori. It recognizes bacterial lipoproteins, lipoteichoic acid, and peptidoglycans, facilitating immune activation in gastric epithelial and immune cells (13). H. pylori infection upregulates TLR2 expression and activates the NF-κB pathway through TLR2 engagement, which is thought to influence both bacterial clearance and disease severity (13, 14). Polymorphisms in the TLR2 gene may affect its expression or function, thereby modulating host responses to infection. Two well-studied variants in this context are the rs3804099 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and the –196 to –174 deletion polymorphism (del) (15, 16). The rs3804099 variant is a synonymous SNP located in exon 3 of the TLR2 gene. Although it does not alter the amino acid sequence, studies suggest it may influence mRNA stability, splicing, or translation efficiency, ultimately impacting receptor expression (17). The –196 to –174del polymorphism, located in the promoter region, has been shown to reduce promoter activity and subsequently TLR2 expression levels, potentially impairing innate immune recognition of H. Pylori (18). Several case–control studies have investigated the association between these polymorphisms and susceptibility to H. pylori infection, with conflicting results (1921). For instance, Mirkamandar et al. found that the CT genotype of rs3804099 was significantly more prevalent in Iranian individuals infected with H. pylori, particularly those harboring cagA-positive strains, compared with uninfected controls (15). This suggested a possible genetic predisposition mediated by TLR2 variation. In contrast, a large-scale Japanese study by Hishida et al. reported no significant association between the –196 to –174del polymorphism and H. pylori seropositivity, gastric atrophy, or gastric cancer, emphasizing the potential influence of ethnic and regional genetic backgrounds (22). This study aims to elucidate the potential contribution of TLR2-mediated innate immunity to H. pylori-related disease outcomes and to explore possible sources of heterogeneity such as ethnicity, genotyping methods, and infection status (e.g. cagA-positive vs. negative strains). Through this investigation, we hope to clarify the role of TLR2 genetic variability in the host–pathogen interaction and its relevance to personalized disease prevention strategies.

Materials and methods

This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines (Supplementary File S1) (2325). A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies published up to January 2025. The search strategy included a combination of keywords and MeSH terms such as ‘Toll-like receptors’, ‘TLR2’, ‘single nucleotide polymorphism’, ‘polymorphism’, ‘variant’, ‘genotype’, and ‘Helicobacter pylori infection’. No language or publication date restrictions were applied. The search results were screened and evaluated according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Eligibility criteria

Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis if they met the following criteria: 1) employed a case–control design investigating the relationship between the TLR2 rs3804099 or TLR2 del –196 to –174 polymorphisms and susceptibility to Helicobacter pylori infection; 2) provided sufficient genotype frequency data to allow for the calculation of effect sizes, either reported directly in the manuscript or derivable from available information; and 3) reported Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) status for the genotype distributions in the control group, ensuring genetic validity. Studies were excluded if they did not conform to a case–control design, presented duplicate findings or insufficient data, or if multiple publications from the same research group used overlapping datasets – in which case, only the study with the largest sample size and most comprehensive data was retained for analysis. These criteria were applied rigorously to ensure the inclusion of high-quality, non-redundant, and methodologically appropriate studies.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Data extraction was independently conducted by two investigators in accordance with the eligibility criteria. Discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion and consensus. Extracted data included: the first author’s name, year of publication, country or ethnicity of the study population, sample sizes for case and control groups, HWE status in controls, average age, sex distribution, and genotype frequencies of the relevant TLR2 polymorphisms in both groups.

Statistical analysis

Meta-analytical computations were performed using R software (version 4.4.2), employing the ‘meta’, metafor’, and ‘dmetar’ packages (26, 27). The associations between the TLR2 rs3804099 and TLR2 del –196 to –174 polymorphisms and H. pylori infection risk were assessed under five genetic models: allelic, dominant, recessive, homozygous, and heterozygous. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each model.

Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Cochran Q test and quantified with the I² statistic. A P < 0.05 or I² > 50% was considered indicative of significant heterogeneity. In such cases, a random-effects model (Der Simonian and Laird method) was applied (28). Potential publication bias was examined using Egger’s linear regression test, and funnel plots were visually inspected. To evaluate the robustness of the findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted by sequentially excluding individual studies.

Results

Study selection and characteristics

A total of 373 records were initially identified through systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. After the removal of duplicates and the screening of titles and abstracts, 10 case–control studies met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. The study selection process is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The flow diagram of study selection and identification for the meta-analysis.

Among the included studies, five investigated the TLR2 rs3804099 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), while the remaining five focused on the TLR2 del –196 to –174 promoter polymorphism. These studies provided detailed data on sample sizes, genotype distributions, demographic characteristics, and HWE status (Table 1). In total, data from 4,521 participants were analyzed, comprising 2,523 individuals infected with H. pylori and 1,998 uninfected controls.

Table 1. Attributes of all case–control investigations included in the meta-analysis.
Authors Year Continent (Country) Age Gender Size of the sample Genotype type frequency (Case) Genotype type frequency (Control)
HP(+) HP(-)
HP(+)/HP(-) (M/F) (M/F) HP(+)/HP(-) AA AG GG AA AG GG
TLR2 del196 to174
Lourenço1 2020 South America (Brazil) 619/233 481 127 11 159 65 9
Habibzadeh4 2017 Asia (Iran) 55/45 42 9 4 26 15 4
Tahara5 2010 Asia (Japan) 123/92 53 54 16 41 39 13
Hishida6 2010 Asia (Japan) 699/937 304 316 79 418 414 105
Rodrıguez7 2013 Asia (China) 190/94 81 90 19 46 39 6
TLR2 rs3804099
Tongtawee9 2018 Asia (Thailand) - - - 204/196 125 28 51 131 41 24
Mirkamandar10 2018 Asia (Iranian) - - - 225/125 84 105 36 56 39 30
Tongtawee11 2018 Asia (Thailand) 46 ± 1.5/ 42 ± 2.5 71/13 65/131 204/196 126 27 51 131 41 24
Eed12 2020 Asia (Saudi Arabia) 45 ± 17.7/42 ± 22.3 117/93 41/39 210/80 171 24 15 65 8 7
Kalkanlı, Tas13 2020 Asia (Turkey) 47.7 ± 12 51.2 ± 12 83/122 84/111 205/195 28 99 78 18 75 102

Meta-analysis findings

Pooled analyses under various genetic models – allelic, dominant, recessive, homozygous, and heterozygous – were conducted for both polymorphisms. For the TLR2 del –196 to –174 variant, no significant association with H. pylori infection risk was detected across any of the models examined. Specifically, the pooled ORs and 95% CIs were as follows: allelic model (A vs. T), OR = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.81–1.35); dominant model (AA vs. AT+TT), OR = 1.14 (95% CI: 0.81–1.59); recessive model (TT vs. AT+AA), OR = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.74–1.24); homozygote model (AA vs. TT), OR = 1.09 (95% CI: 0.73–1.64); and heterozygote model (AT vs. TT), OR = 1.02 (95% CI: 0.78–1.35).

Similarly, no statistically significant associations were observed for the TLR2 rs3804099 polymorphism under any of the genetic models: allelic model (A vs. T), OR = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.25–1.24); dominant model (AA vs. AT+TT), OR = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.42–1.36); recessive model (TT vs. AT+AA), OR = 1.81 (95% CI: 0.81–4.08); homozygote model (AA vs. TT), OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.20–1.21); and heterozygote model (AT vs. TT), OR = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.20–1.20). These results are summarized in Table 2 and graphically represented in Figures 2 and 3.

Table 2. Meta-analysis results of TLR2 gene polymorphisms and the risk of H. pylori infection.
Type of Toll-like receptor Comparison N Association analysis Heterogeneity analysis Egger’s test of publication bias
OR 95% CI P P I²% P
TLR2 del196 to174 A vs. T 5 1.04 (0.81, 1.35) 0.746 0.412 0.00% 0.653
AA vs. AT+TT 5 1.14 (0.81, 1.59) 0.457 0.012 69.00% 0.586
AA vs. TT 5 1.09 (0.73, 1.64) 0.671 0.226 29.30% 0.607
TT vs. AT+AA 5 0.96 (0.74, 1.24) 0.746 0.412 0.00% 0.653
AT vs. TT 5 1.02 (0.78, 1.35) 0.861 0.771 0.00% 0.815
TLR2 rs3804099 A vs. T 5 0.55 (0.25, 1.24) 0.151 < 0.001 89.44% 0.666
AA vs. AT+TT 5 0.75 (0.42, 1.36) 0.347 < 0.001 88.94% 0.769
AA vs. TT 5 0.49 (0.20, 1.21) 0.121 < 0.001 90.17% 0.870
TT vs. AT+AA 5 1.81 (0.81, 4.08) 0.151 < 0.001 89.44% 0.666
AT vs. TT 5 0.48 (0.20, 1.20) 0.116 < 0.001 88.30% 0.945
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

 

Figure 2
Figure 2. Meta-analysis of the association between TLR2 rs3804099 polymorphism and the risk of H. pylori infection was analyzed under the dominant (A vs. T) (a), recessive (AA vs. AT+TT) (b), allelic (AA vs. TT) (c), homozygote (TT vs. AT+AA) (d), and heterozygote (AT vs. TT) (e) genetic models.

 

Figure 3
Figure 3. Meta-analysis of the association between TLR2 del –196 to –174 polymorphism and the risk of H. pylori infection was analyzed under the dominant (A vs. T) (a), recessive (AA vs. AT+TT) (b), allelic (AA vs. TT) (c), homozygote (TT vs. AT+AA) (d), and heterozygote (AT vs. TT) (e) genetic models.

Heterogeneity and publication bias

The analysis of heterogeneity revealed substantial between-study variability for most genetic models involving the TLR2 rs3804099 polymorphism (I² > 88%, P < 0.001), whereas the TLR2 del –196 to –174 polymorphism exhibited low to moderate heterogeneity in most comparisons. Consequently, a random-effects model was employed where appropriate.

Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test and visual inspection of funnel plots (Supplementary Files S2–S3). No significant asymmetry was detected (P > 0.05 across all models), indicating a low likelihood of publication bias (Table 2).

To further explore the robustness of the results and identify potential sources of heterogeneity, we performed leave-one-out sensitivity analyses for each genetic model and polymorphism (Supplementary File S4). While no single study disproportionately influenced the results for the del –196 to –174 variant, the rs3804099 analyses revealed that exclusion of Mirkamandar et al. (15) substantially reduced or eliminated heterogeneity and yielded statistically significant associations under certain models. This finding suggests that the study by Mirkamandar et al., which was the only one to provide cagA-stratified genotype data, had a uniquely strong influence on the pooled results for rs3804099, likely due to its specific population and bacterial strain characteristics.

Discussion

This meta-analysis sought to elucidate the relationship between two extensively studied Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) polymorphisms – rs3804099 and del –196 to –174 – and susceptibility to H. pylori infection. Although biological plausibility and previous findings suggested a potential role for TLR2 in host immune responses to H. pylori, our pooled analyses across multiple genetic models did not reveal any statistically significant association between either polymorphism or infection risk.

The rs3804099 variant, although a synonymous SNP, has been proposed to influence immune regulation via potential effects on mRNA splicing, stability, or translation efficiency (15). The del −196 to −174 polymorphism, located in the gene’s promoter region, is known to affect transcriptional activity and, consequently, receptor expression levels. It was thus hypothesized that these variants could modulate host–pathogen interactions by altering TLR2 expression or function. Indeed, Mirkamandar et al. reported that the CT genotype at rs3804099 was significantly more prevalent in H. pylori-infected individuals, especially among those harboring cagA-positive strains, compared with healthy controls in an Iranian cohort (15). This observation suggested a genotype-dependent modulation of host immune responses, potentially predisposing certain individuals to more severe H. pylori-related outcomes such as peptic ulcer. However, the results of our meta-analysis, which includes data from diverse populations, do not support a consistent association. One possible explanation for this discrepancy could be population stratification and genetic heterogeneity among the included cohorts. For instance, while the Iranian population showed enrichment of the CT genotype in infected subjects, such findings were not replicated in East Asian or Turkish cohorts. This aligns with Moura et al., who observed no significant association between TLR2 polymorphisms and H. pylori infection or duodenal ulcer in Brazilian children, despite examining multiple TLR genes, including TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5. These findings underscore the complex and likely population-specific nature of TLR2 genetic contributions to H. pylori pathogenesis (29).

Another factor contributing to the variation across studies may be the interaction between host genotype and bacterial virulence determinants. The influence of TLR2 variants could be more evident in infections involving highly virulent H. pylori strains, particularly those expressing CagA or VacA. Mirkamandar et al. noted that the rs3804099 CT genotype was associated with a higher prevalence of CagA-positive infection, supporting the notion that specific host–pathogen combinations may exacerbate disease severity (15). Unfortunately, most studies included in our meta-analysis did not stratify data by H. pylori strain subtype, precluding a more granular evaluation of this interaction.

In terms of immune response, TLR2 activation by H. pylori components, such as lipoproteins and peptidoglycans, leads to NF-κB activation and subsequent cytokine production (30). Functional studies have shown that certain TLR2 genotypes can influence cytokine profiles, including TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-10, upon bacterial stimulation (31, 32). While this provides a mechanistic basis for genetic modulation of infection outcomes, the absence of a consistent epidemiological association in our analysis suggests that these effects may be context-dependent or modulated by additional genetic and environmental factors.

This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence regarding the association between TLR2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to H. pylori infection. Several strengths should be noted, including strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines, broad literature coverage, and robust evaluation of heterogeneity and publication bias through multiple complementary techniques.

However, several limitations must be acknowledged to contextualize our findings and guide future research. First, both TLR2 rs3804099 and del –196 to –174 polymorphisms were investigated in only five independent studies each, inherently limiting the statistical power to detect modest associations or to perform formal subgroup or meta-regression analyses. Although variables such as ethnicity and H. pylori virulence determinants (e.g. CagA status) were recognized a priori as potential effect modifiers, the included studies lacked sufficient ethnic and geographic diversity, as well as stratified reporting. Of the 10 total studies, only Mirkamandar et al. (15) provided genotype data stratified by CagA status, and only the study by Lourenço et al. (18) was conducted in a non-Asian population. The majority of included studies were conducted in Asian populations, thereby limiting the ability to explore regional variation or perform stratified analyses by ethnicity.

It is also important to note that nine of the 10 studies included in this meta-analysis originated from Asian populations, reflecting both the higher epidemiological burden of H. pylori infection and the predominance of molecular genetic research in these regions. This geographical imbalance inevitably limits the generalizability of our findings to non-Asian populations. Published population-genetic data, including those from the 1,000 Genomes and HapMap projects, indicate clear inter-ethnic variability in TLR2 allele frequencies – particularly for rs3804099 and the del −196 to −174 variant – with minor alleles occurring more frequently in East Asian than in European or African cohorts. Such differences may influence receptor expression levels or downstream signaling responsiveness, potentially modifying infection susceptibility. Therefore, while our results provide robust evidence for Asian populations, extrapolation to other regions should be made cautiously, and further studies involving Western and African populations are warranted to confirm the global relevance of these associations.

While no substantial heterogeneity was observed for the del –196 to –174 polymorphism across any genetic model, considerable between-study heterogeneity was detected in the rs3804099 analysis. To further assess the robustness of the findings and investigate potential sources of heterogeneity specific to rs3804099, we conducted leave-one-out sensitivity analyses across all genetic models related to this variant (see Supplementary File S4).

Notably, under the heterozygote model for rs3804099 (Genetic Model E), exclusion of Mirkamandar et al. (15) resulted in a statistically significant association (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21–0.42) and completely eliminated heterogeneity (I² = 0%, P = 0.529). A similar effect was observed under the dominant model (Model A), where removing the same study yielded a significant association (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21–0.79) and reduced heterogeneity from 88.3% to 79.5% (P = 0.002). These findings suggest that Mirkamandar et al. had a disproportionately large influence on the pooled estimates and heterogeneity under certain genetic models for rs3804099 – likely due to its unique stratification by CagA status. Although this observation cannot substitute for formal subgroup analysis, it provides indirect support for the hypothesis that CagA-positive H. pylori strains may modulate the association between rs3804099 and infection susceptibility. This aligns with the biological rationale that TLR2 plays a key role in mediating host–pathogen interactions, especially in response to virulent H. pylori strains. However, due to the lack of comparable stratified data in other studies, we were unable to explore this relationship more deeply through subgroup or meta-regression analysis.

Additionally, important potential confounding variables – such as dietary habits, smoking status, co-infections, socioeconomic status, and environmental exposures – were not consistently reported across studies, which further limited interpretability. Likewise, differences in H. pylori diagnostic methods (e.g. histology, PCR, rapid urease test, and serology) may have introduced misclassification bias, potentially affecting the accuracy of infection status classification and contributing to heterogeneity in effect estimates. Although subgroup analysis based on diagnostic method was not feasible due to insufficient or inconsistent reporting, we acknowledge this heterogeneity as a limitation of our study. This emphasizes how crucial it is for future genetic association research to employ standardized and verified diagnostic procedures.

Despite these limitations, our sensitivity analysis adds an important dimension to the interpretation of pooled results, helping to identify specific studies that disproportionately affect outcomes and potentially introduce heterogeneity. The fact that the only study reporting CagA-stratified genotypes was also the primary contributor to heterogeneity underscores the importance of future research incorporating bacterial virulence markers and host characteristics. Future investigations should present genotype data stratified by ethnicity and bacterial virulence factors, thereby enabling more refined analyses of gene–environment and gene–pathogen interactions.

In conclusion, although this meta-analysis did not reveal a consistent overall association between TLR2 rs3804099 or del −196 to −174 polymorphisms and H. pylori susceptibility, the results suggest that these variants may influence infection risk in specific genetic or bacterial contexts. Future investigations with larger, ethnically diverse cohorts and standardized reporting of bacterial virulence markers are warranted to further elucidate the nuanced role of TLR2 variability in host susceptibility and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, we did not observe statistically significant associations between the TLR2 rs3804099 and del –196 to –174 polymorphisms and susceptibility to H. pylori infection across the included studies. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to key limitations, including the small number of available studies, high between-study heterogeneity (especially for rs3804099), and lack of stratified or subgroup analyses. Sensitivity analysis suggested a potential role for CagA status in modifying the association with rs3804099, but this finding remains hypothesis-generating rather than conclusive. Overall, the current evidence does not support a consistent genetic effect of these variants; nevertheless, further well-designed studies with larger and more diverse populations, bacterial genotyping, and stratified analyses are required to clarify the context-dependent nature of TLR2’s contribution to H. pylori infection risk.

ORCID

Duygu Kirkik images https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-6915

Sevgi Demircioğlu images https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3900-0713

Sevgi Kalkanli Taş images https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5288-6040

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgments to declare.

Notes on contributors

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data extraction, and statistical analysis and interpretation were performed by SD. DK conducted the literature review, contributed to the interpretation of findings from a clinical and public health perspective, and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SD and extensively reviewed and refined by SKT and DK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1. Parikh NS, Ahlawat R. Helicobacter Pylori. Pylori. [Updated 2023 Aug 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 August. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534233/
2. Reyes VE. Helicobacter pylori and its role in gastric cancer. Microorganisms. 2023;11:1312. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051312
3. McConaghy JR, Decker A, Nair S. Peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection: common questions and answers. Am Fam Physician. 2023;107:165–72.
4. Kuo SH, Cheng AL. Helicobacter pylori and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: what’s new. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:109–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.109
5. Li D, Jiang SF, Lei NY, Shah SC, Corley DA. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on the incidence of noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma in a large diverse population in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2023;165:391–401.e2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.026
6. Kumar S, Patel GK, Ghoshal UC. Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation: possible factors modulating the risk of gastric cancer. Pathogens. 2021;10:1099. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091099
7. Kim SS, Ruiz VE, Carroll JD, Moss SF. Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer and gastric lymphoma. Cancer Lett. 2011;305:228–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2010.07.014
8. Bridge DR, Merrell DS. Polymorphism in the Helicobacter pylori CagA and VacA toxins and disease. Gut Microbes. 2013;4:101–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23797
9. Šterbenc A, Jarc E, Poljak M, Homan M. Helicobacter pylori virulence genes. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:4870–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4870
10. Sharndama HC, Mba IE. Helicobacter pylori: an up-to-date overview on the virulence and pathogenesis mechanisms. Braz J Microbiol. 2022;53:33–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00675-0
11. Cheok YY, Tan GMY, Lee CYQ, Abdullah S, Looi CY, Wong WF. Innate immunity crosstalk with Helicobacter pylori: pattern recognition receptors and cellular responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:7561. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147561
12. Duan T, Du Y, Xing C, Wang HY, Wang RF. Toll-like receptor signaling and its role in cell-mediated immunity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:812774. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.812774
13. Liu T, Zhang L, Joo D, Sun SC. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2017;2:17023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23
14. Meliț LE, Mărginean CO, Mărginean CD, Mărginean MO. The relationship between Toll-like receptors and Helicobacter pylori-related gastropathies: still a controversial topic. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:8197048. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8197048
15. Mirkamandar E, Nemati M, Hayatbakhsh MM, Bassagh A, Khosravimashizi A, Jafarzadeh A. Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the TLR2 gene (rs3804099), but not in the TLR4 gene (rs4986790), with Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018;29:283–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2018.17484
16. Chen L, Lin MJ, Zhan LL, Lv XP. Analysis of TLR4 and TLR2 polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel disease in a Guangxi Zhuang population. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:6856–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6856
17. Kaissarian NM, Meyer D, Kimchi-Sarfaty C. Synonymous variants: necessary nuance in our understanding of cancer drivers and treatment outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114:1072–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac090
18. Lourenço CM, Susi MD, do Nascimento MCA, Serafim Junior V, Vila APS, Rodrigues-Flemming GH, et al. Characterization and strong risk association of TLR2 del -196 to -174 polymorphism and Helicobacter pylori and their influence on mRNA expression in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;12:535–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i5.535
19. BaniHani MN, Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Bashir NA, Shakhatreh MAK, Sabi SH, et al. The association between ABCB1 C1236T/C3435T SNPs and H. pylori infection among Jordanians. Genes (Basel). 2020;11:63. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11010063
20. Sun X, Xu Y, Wang L, Zhang F, Zhang J, Fu X, et al. Association between TNFA gene polymorphisms and Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147410
21. Ma X, Lu L, Tang Y, Luo W, Li J, Tang M. Association between Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of Helicobacter pylori infection: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100:e25729. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025729
22. Hishida A, Matsuo K, Goto Y, Naito M, Wakai K, Tajima K, et al. No associations of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)-196 to -174del polymorphism with the risk of Helicobacter pylori seropositivity, gastric atrophy, and gastric cancer in Japanese. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:251–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-010-0567-y
23. Naylor CD. Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research. BMJ. 1997;315:617–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.617
24. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:777–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.732/M14-2385
25. Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083138
26. Schwarzer G. Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News. 2007;7:40–5.
27. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the meta for package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36:1–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
28. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
29. Moura SB, Almeida LR, Guerra JB, Rocha GA, Rocha AM, Melo FF, et al. Toll-like receptor (TLR2, TLR4 and TLR5) gene polymorphisms and Helicobacter pylori infection in children with and without duodenal ulcer. Microbes Infect. 2008;10:1477–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2008.08.009
30. Smith SM. Role of toll-like receptors in Helicobacter pylori infection and immunity. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2014;5:133–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.133
31. Flores-González J, Monroy-Rodríguez Z, Falfán-Valencia R, Buendía-Roldán I, Fricke-Galindo I, Hernández-Zenteno R, et al. Variants rs3804099 and rs3804100 in the TLR2 gene induce different profiles of TLR-2 expression and cytokines in response to spike of SARS-CoV-2. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:11063. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011063
32. Xia P, Wu Y, Lian S, Yan L, Meng X, Duan Q, et al. Research progress on toll-like receptor signal transduction and its roles in antimicrobial immune responses. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105:5341–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11406-8