CASE REPORT
Beatriz Tavares da Silvaa, Diogo Brandão Nevesa, Maria Teresa Pereiraa, Carolina Noronhab, Isabel Ribeirob and Cláudia Amarala
aClinical Outpatient of Endocrinology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; bClinical Outpatient of Neurosurgery, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
Background: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant tumor predisposition syndrome involving primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs), and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. MEN1-associated insulinomas may present with multifocal disease, complicating management, while Cushing’s disease is uncommon, and the coexistence of multiple functioning tumors complicates management.
Case presentation: A 28-year-old man presented with adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent hypercortisolism and progressive cushingoid features. Pituitary Magnetic Resonance Imaging revealed a microadenoma, confirmed as a PitNET on histopathology. Concurrent PHPT and genetically confirmed MEN1 (splice-site pathogenic variant c.825-1G>A) were identified. Transsphenoidal surgery failed to achieve remission, and metyrapone provided partial control. Subtotal parathyroidectomy resulted in persistent PHPT. Imaging revealed multifocal pancreatic NETs with biochemically confirmed insulinoma. Lanreotide achieved complete resolution of hypoglycemia, while 68Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 positron emission tomography/computed tomography did not identify a dominant lesion, supporting conservative management.
Conclusion: This case highlights the complexity of MEN1 with multiple functioning tumors and the clinical impact of hormonal interactions. It underscores the importance of multidisciplinary, individualized management, particularly when tumor multifocality limits surgical options. It also emphasizes the need to recognize complex endocrine syndromes in general clinical practice.
KEYWORDS Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; Cushing’s disease; insulinoma; diagnostic imaging
Citation: UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2026, 131, e14421
http://dx.doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v131.14421
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Upsala Medical Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 April 2026; Revised: 28 May 2026; Accepted: 2 June 2026; Published: 6 August 2026
Competing interests and funding: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
CONTACT Beatriz Tavares da Silva, MD u14484@chporto.min-saude.pt
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome caused by germline inactivating pathogenic variants in the MEN1 gene, which encodes menin, a tumor suppressor involved in transcriptional regulation and genome stability (1, 2). MEN1 predisposes to multiple endocrine tumors, classically affecting the parathyroid glands, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) (1, 3). Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is the most frequent and often earliest manifestation. MEN1-associated PHPT is typically more severe than sporadic disease, with earlier onset and greater risk of renal and skeletal complications (1, 3, 4).
pNETs are observed in up to 70–80% of MEN1 patients and represent a major source of morbidity (5). While insulinomas are usually solitary, multifocal pancreatic involvement may occur in MEN1 and can complicate tumor localization (1, 5, 6). Pituitary involvement is commonly lactotroph-predominant; conversely, corticotroph PitNETs causing Cushing’s disease (CD) are uncommon (less than 5%), and the coexistence of distinct functional PitNETs is particularly rare (less than 1%) (7, 8). MEN1-associated PitNETs may also show more aggressive behavior, although current evidence suggests that treatment response of MEN1-associated PitNETs is not significantly different from sporadic cases (9).
We report a young man with MEN1 presenting with CD, hyperprolactinemia consistent with lactotroph involvement, PHPT, and multifocal pNETs including a biochemically confirmed insulinoma. The case highlights diagnostic ambiguity driven by tumor multifocality and overlapping endocrine syndromes, and the need for multidisciplinary, individualized management.
A 28-year-old previously healthy man presented with progressive cushingoid features, including a 30-kg weight gain (approximately 23% from baseline) and central obesity (body mass index 40.4 kg/m2), followed by the development of violaceous abdominal striae and facial fullness. Physical examination also revealed several large subcutaneous lipomas. Blood pressure at presentation was 142/73 mmHg. Initial laboratory evaluation demonstrated hypercalcemia (albumin-corrected calcium of 12.3 mg/dL, reference: 8.6–10.2), hypophosphatemia (2.1 mg/dL, reference: 2.5–4.5), and markedly elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH 270.4 pg/mL, reference: 15–65), consistent with PHPT. In parallel, CD was suspected based on persistently elevated 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC) – 181.0 µg/24 h and 198.0 µg/24 h (reference: 5.2–136). This was accompanied by high-normal plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels (47.2 pg/mL, reference: 10–60). Family history was negative for MEN1-related tumors.
The patient was referred to the Endocrinology Department in April 2024 for comprehensive evaluation of these findings. The clinical timeline, summarizing the onset of symptoms and the sequential multidisciplinary interventions, is detailed in Table 1. Table 2 provides the key biochemical findings before and after the performed treatments.
Biochemical reassessment confirmed ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, characterized by elevated midnight salivary cortisol (0.478 µg/dL; reference: <0.261), increased 24-h UFC (187.0 µg/24h; reference: 4.3–176.0), and persistently elevated ACTH (40.8 pg/mL, reference: 10–60). Additional endocrine evaluation revealed multiaxis pituitary involvement, including hyperprolactinemia (65.6 ng/mL; reference: 4.04–15.20), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (FSH 4.6 mIU/mL, LH 3.5 mIU/mL, and total testosterone 0.80 ng/mL [reference: 2.8–8.0]), and central hypothyroidism (FT4 0.95 ng/dL, reference: 1.01–1.65; TSH 3.07 µUI/mL, reference: 0.30–3.18).
Pituitary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) identified a 7-mm right-sided pituitary microadenoma. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) demonstrated a central-to-peripheral ACTH gradient of 16 at baseline and 75 after stimulation, supporting a pituitary source of ACTH secretion. However, due to technical inability to catheterize the left inferior petrosal sinus, lateralization could not be reliably assessed. The patient underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in September 2024. Histopathological examination revealed a plurihormonal PitNET. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated strong prolactin expression with focal growth hormone positivity and absence of ACTH staining. The Ki-67 proliferation index was low (< 3%), consistent with a well-differentiated tumor. Transcription factor analysis (PIT1, TPIT, SF1) was not available. Immediate postoperative morning serum cortisol remained elevated (18.5 µg/dL), indicating a lack of biochemical remission.
Postoperative pituitary MRI demonstrated a residual 6-mm lobulated lesion in the left sellar region with slight cavernous sinus extension. Given persistent hypercortisolism (midnight salivary cortisol 0.478 µg/dL, reference: < 0.261), medical therapy with cabergoline (1.5 mg/week) and metyrapone (750 mg/day) was initiated. Prolactin levels normalized postoperatively (0.8 ng/mL), prior to initiation of dopamine agonist therapy. While this strategy initially achieved clinical improvement and a reduction in cortisol (UFC 61.6 µg/24 h, reference: 4.3–176.0), only partial biochemical control was sustained, requiring a dose escalation of metyrapone to 1,000 mg/day. The patient is currently awaiting reassessment for potential surgical reintervention.
Repeat evaluation confirmed persistent PHPT, with hypercalcemia (12.7 mg/dL, reference: 8.6–10.2 mg/dL), hypophosphatemia (2.23 mg/dL, reference: 2.5–4.5 mg/dL), and elevated PTH (229 pg/mL, reference: 15–65 pg/mL). Parathyroid scintigraphy demonstrated bilateral hyperfunctioning tissue, and renal ultrasound revealed a 7-mm calculus. Bone densitometry showed osteopenia (Z-score –1.8 at the wrist; –1.0 at the lumbar spine and femoral neck). Intravenous zoledronic acid was administered for metabolic stabilization.
In July 2025, the patient underwent subtotal parathyroidectomy (3⅓ glands) combined with transcervical thymectomy. Histopathological examination confirmed diffuse parathyroid hyperplasia. However, postoperative biochemical assessment demonstrated persistent PHPT (PTH 221.0 pg/mL; albumin-corrected calcium 11.2 mg/dL; phosphorus 1.7 mg/dL). Medical therapy with denosumab was initiated. Although cinacalcet was initially discontinued due to gastrointestinal intolerance, an alternate-day dosing regimen was subsequently introduced to improve tolerability. This strategy resulted in partial biochemical improvement, with albumin-corrected calcium of 10.7 mg/dL (reference: 8.6–10.2 mg/dL), phosphatemia of 2.5 mg/dL (reference: 2.5–4.5 mg/dL), and persistently elevated PTH levels (246.3 pg/mL; reference: 15–65 pg/mL). If this conservative approach fails to achieve sustained biochemical control or remains poorly tolerated, surgical re-exploration with resection of half of the remaining parathyroid remnant is planned.
A pathogenic MEN1 splice-site variant (c.825-1G>A) was identified, confirming the diagnosis of MEN1. Abdominal CT initially revealed two hypervascular nodules in the pancreatic tail (1.4 and 1.6 cm), suspicious for pNETs. Subsequent 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) demonstrated four somatostatin receptor-positive pancreatic lesions, and endoscopic ultrasound further identified four well-demarcated hypoechoic pancreatic nodules, including a 20.9 × 11 mm lesion adjacent to the uncinate process (Figure 1a–d). Fine-needle aspiration cytology confirmed a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with a Ki-67 index < 3%.
Figure 1. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) of the pancreas. (a–d) Linear-array EUS images demonstrating multiple well-demarcated, hypoechoic, solid pancreatic nodules in the body and tail, consistent with multifocal pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surrounding vascular structures were preserved. Fine-needle aspiration confirmed a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with a Ki-67 index < 3%.
The diagnosis of a functioning insulinoma emerged during the preoperative period for pituitary surgery. The prolonged fasting required for the management of CD unmasked a state of severe hypoglycemia, initially noted on routine blood work with a plasma glucose of 42 mg/dL. The patient reported recurrent nocturnal and fasting-related hypoglycemic symptoms, including diaphoresis, tremor, fatigue, and intermittent confusion compatible with neuroglycopenia. A formal 12-h fast, terminated early due to symptomatic hypoglycemia fulfilling Whipple’s triad, confirmed endogenous hyperinsulinism (glucose 47 mg/dL, insulin 33 µU/mL [reference: < 10], and C-peptide 7.28 ng/mL [reference: 0.5–2.0]), fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for insulinoma. The severity of these hypoglycemic episodes was objectively captured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which demonstrated frequent and clinically significant nocturnal events (Figure 2a–b).
Figure 2. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) before and after initiation of lanreotide. (a) Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) prior to treatment demonstrating marked glycemic instability and recurrent hypoglycemic episodes, particularly during nocturnal and fasting periods. (b) Representative daily glucose tracings (October 2024) illustrating high frequency of clinically significant hypoglycemia. (c) Post-treatment AGP following lanreotide initiation, showing stabilized glucose variability and near-complete suppression of hypoglycemic events, with the majority of values within the target range (70–180 mg/dL).
Following discussion at a multidisciplinary endocrine tumor board, medical therapy with lanreotide autogel (120 mg every 28 days) was initiated. This served a dual purpose: providing symptomatic treatment for the insulinoma and utilizing its antiproliferative effects for the management of the multiple pNETs. After the initiation of lanreotide, the ambulatory glucose profile showed near-complete suppression of hypoglycemic events (Figure 2c). This biochemical improvement was accompanied by complete resolution of hypoglycemic symptoms. To support potential surgical planning, advanced localization with 68Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT was performed; however, no single dominant insulinoma focus was identified (Figure 3). This conservative pharmacological approach led to marked clinical improvement, with complete resolution of hypoglycemic episodes and documented disease stability on the most recent abdominal MRI in January 2026.
Figure 3. 68Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT images showing GLP-1 receptor uptake in the pancreatic region in the context of MEN1-associated multifocal pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Consecutive axial fused PET/CT images demonstrate uptake corresponding to the pancreatic lesions, indicated by arrows. No single dominant GLP-1R-avid lesion was identified to account for the patient’s hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, limiting surgical localization. PET/CT: positron emission tomography/computed tomography; GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide-1; MEN1: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1.
At the most recent follow-up in January 2026, the patient remained clinically stable with no recurrence of hypoglycemic episodes, although persistent cushingoid features were still noted. During this period, the patient also underwent surgical excision of large, symptomatic subcutaneous lipomas. No evidence of bronchopulmonary, thymic, duodenal neuroendocrine tumors or adrenal lesions was identified during the evaluation. The current therapeutic regimen consists of medical therapy with lanreotide, cabergoline, and metyrapone, supplemented by endocrine replacement and antihypertensive treatment. Ongoing surveillance is being maintained through serial biochemical testing and cross-sectional imaging, while further surgical strategies for both pituitary and parathyroid disease remain under multidisciplinary evaluation.
This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of MEN1 when multiple functioning tumors coexist. Although the classic MEN1 triad is well recognized, phenotypic heterogeneity often complicates the clinical course. In this patient, diagnostic suspicion was reinforced by non-endocrine manifestations, particularly subcutaneous lipomas, a common cutaneous feature of the syndrome. These findings emphasize the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion in patients with pluriglandular involvement.
Pituitary disease in MEN1 is typically lactotroph-predominant, whereas CD is rare (7, 8). This case is notable for CD confirmed by IPSS, associated with hyperprolactinemia and a plurihormonal PitNET phenotype. Although ACTH immunostaining was negative and postoperative remission was not achieved, the diagnosis of pituitary ACTH-dependent disease was supported by IPSS demonstrating a significant central-to-peripheral ACTH gradient. Ectopic ACTH secretion was considered in the differential diagnosis given the presence of multiple neuroendocrine tumors; however, imaging studies did not identify a thoracic or extrapituitary ACTH-secreting lesion. Plurihormonal PitNETs have been described in MEN1 and may reflect lineage plasticity or technical limitations of immunohistochemistry (4, 8). MEN1-associated PitNETs may also behave more aggressively, contributing to persistent disease after surgery (9). Repeat surgery was deferred due to cavernous sinus invasion, which is associated with lower remission rates and higher morbidity, particularly in MEN1-related tumors (9). Reoperation also carries increased risk of hypopituitarism, vascular injury, and cranial nerve deficits (10). Medical therapy was therefore used as a bridge to re-intervention, with metyrapone providing biochemical control and agents such as osilodrostat or relacorilant representing additional options (10, 11). Pasireotide could also be considered given its activity in corticotroph and neuroendocrine tumors (12, 13); however, its off-label use limited its applicability in this case.
PHPT is usually the earliest and most penetrant MEN1 manifestation and frequently requires surgery due to multiglandular involvement (1, 3, 14). In this patient, severe biochemical disease with renal and skeletal complications supported early surgical intervention.
Management of multifocal pNETs remains challenging, particularly when insulinoma coexists with other lesions (5, 6, 15, 16). In this case, the interaction between hormonal excess states was clinically relevant. Hypercortisolism may have attenuated hypoglycemia through cortisol-induced insulin resistance (1, 6). Hypoglycemia became evident only after treatment of CD, highlighting this physiological antagonism and its potential clinical impact (6, 16). Multifocality and small lesion size limit the sensitivity of conventional and functional imaging (5, 6). Although somatostatin receptor PET/CT (17) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor imaging (18, 19) improve detection, they may fail to identify a dominant lesion. Even after extensive evaluation, localization may remain inconclusive (14, 16, 17). SACST is recommended in such settings (6, 20), but in this case its utility was limited by the presence of multiple lesions within the same pancreatic regions and the low likelihood of altering surgical strategy. Initial suspicion of lymph node involvement was not confirmed after multidisciplinary review (6, 15).
Surgical management of MEN1-associated pNETs is further complicated by the need to balance disease control and preservation of pancreatic function. While extensive pancreatic resection may achieve biochemical control, it is associated with significant long-term morbidity (21, 22). Importantly, the largest pancreatic lesion exceeded 2 cm, a threshold generally associated with increased metastatic potential in MEN1-associated pNETs and frequently considered an indication for surgical intervention (15, 21). However, the absence of a clearly dominant insulin-secreting lesion, the multifocal pancreatic disease burden, and the favorable biochemical and clinical response to lanreotide supported an initial conservative multidisciplinary approach.
Although multiple functioning tumors are well recognized in MEN1, the coexistence of CD and insulinoma is rarely reported. Most cases describe isolated pituitary or pancreatic involvement, or combinations of non-functioning tumors, highlighting the heterogeneity of the syndrome (23–25). Insulinomas are often multifocal and may recur, further complicating management (23, 25). This case underscores the need for individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making, taking into account tumor dominance, hormonal activity, and feasibility of intervention.
This case underscores the need for individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making, particularly in the presence of interacting hormonal excess states. Early genetic diagnosis, coupled with advanced functional imaging and strategic therapeutic sequencing, remains pivotal in optimizing outcomes. Management of MEN1 requires careful sequencing of interventions, balancing competing endocrine risks, specifically the dangerous interplay between hypercortisolism and hypoglycemia, while addressing multiglandular and multifocal disease.
This study is a retrospective case report. According to the institutional policies of the Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, ethical approval is not required for retrospective case reports conducted in accordance with local and national regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.
BTS: Conceptualization; Data curation; Writing – original draft.
DBN: Data curation; Writing – review and editing.
MTP: Supervision; Writing – review and editing.
CN: Resources (neurosurgery).
IR: Resources (neurosurgery).
CA: Supervision; Writing – review and editing.
The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to ethical and legal restrictions related to patient confidentiality. It may be made available upon reasonable request and institutional approval.
| 1. | Thakker RV, Newey PJ, Walls GV, Bilezikian J, Dralle H, Ebeling PR, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2990–3011. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1230 |
| 2. | Agarwal SK, Guru SC, Heppner C, Erdos MR, Collins RM, Park SY, et al. Menin interacts with the AP1 transcription factor JunD and represses JunD-activated transcription. Cell. 1999;96:143–52. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80967-8 |
| 3. | Goudet P, Dalac A, Le Bras M, Cardot-Bauters C, Niccoli P, Lévy-Bohbot N, et al. MEN1 disease: natural history and long-term follow-up of a cohort of 195 patients. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2022;29:R1–16. |
| 4. | Vergès B, Boureille F, Goudet P, Murat A, Beckers A, Sassolas G, et al. Pituitary disease in MEN1: data from the France-Belgium MEN1 multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):457–65. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8145 |
| 5. | Niederle B, Selberherr A, Bartsch DK, Brandi ML, Doherty GM, Falconi M, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and the pancreas: diagnosis and treatment of functioning and non-functioning pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasia within the MEN1 syndrome – an international consensus statement. Neuroendocrinology. 2021;111(7):609–30. doi: 10.1159/000511791 |
| 6. | Ito T, Igarashi H, Jensen RT. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: clinical features, diagnosis and medical treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;26:737–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2012.12.003 |
| 7. | Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N, Dantony E, Cortet-Rudelli C, Viennet G, et al. Concurrent prolactinoma and corticotroph hyperplasia in MEN1: a clinicopathological study. Pituitary. 2018;21:591–9. |
| 8. | de Laat JM, van der Luijt RB, Pieterman CRC, Oostveen MP, Hermus AR, Dekkers OM, et al. MEN1 redefined, a clinical comparison of mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients. BMC Med. 2016;14:182. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0708-1 |
| 9. | Antwi K, Faggiano A, Ferolla P, Baldeweg SE, Falchetti A, Alcocer MJC, et al. Aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes. Pituitary. 2019;22:617–28. |
| 10. | Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Findling J, Shimatsu A, et al. Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in Cushing’s disease (LINC 3): a multicentre phase 3 study with long-term extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:748–61. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30240-0 |
| 11. | Pivonello R, Bancos I, Feelders RA, Kargi AY, Kerr JM, Gordon MB, et al. Relacorilant, a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, induces clinical improvements in patients with Cushing syndrome: results from a prospective, open-label phase 2 study. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:662865. |
| 12. | Colao A, Petersenn S, Newell-Price J, Findling JW, Gu F, Maldonado M, et al. A 12-month phase 3 study of pasireotide in Cushing’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):914–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105743 |
| 13. | Pivonello R, De Martino MC, De Leo M, Simeoli C, Cozzolino A, Colao A. Efficacy and safety of pasireotide in Cushing’s disease: a review. Endocrine. 2020;70(2):211–22. |
| 14. | El Lakis M, Nockel P, Gaitanidis A, Moore E, Nilubol N, Patel D, et al. Recurrence after subtotal parathyroidectomy for MEN1-associated hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg. 2021;45:1540–7. |
| 15. | Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G, Bartsch DK, Capdevila J, Caplin M, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:153–71. doi: 10.1159/000443171 |
| 16. | Jensen RT, Cadiot G, Brandi ML, de Herder WW, Kaltsas G, Komminoth P, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: functional pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:98–119. doi: 10.1159/000335591 |
| 17. | Sadowski SM, Neychev V, Millo C, Shih J, Nilubol N, Herscovitch P, et al. Prospective study of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for detection of neuroendocrine tumors in MEN1. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:543–50. |
| 18. | Antwi K, Nicolas G, Fani M, Heye T, Pattou F, Grossman A, et al. 68Ga-Exendin-4 PET/CT detects insulinomas in patients with endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in MEN1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(12):5843–52. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02754 |
| 19. | Antwi K, Fani M, Heye T, Nicolas G, Rottenburger C, Kaul F, et al. Comparison of GLP-1 receptor PET/CT, somatostatin receptor PET/CT, and CT/MRI for detection of pancreatic insulinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(13):2318–27. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4101-5 |
| 20. | Guettier JM, Kam A, Chang R, Skarulis MC, Cochran C, Alexander HR, et al. Localization of insulinomas by selective intra-arterial calcium stimulation with hepatic venous sampling: NIH experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1074–80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1986 |
| 21. | Triponez F, Sadowski SM, Pattou F, Cardot-Bauters C, Mirallié E, Le Bras M, et al. Long-term follow-up of MEN1 patients who do not have initial surgery for small ≤2 cm nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an AFCE and GTE study. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):158–64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002191 |
| 22. | Heidsma CM, Dekker HM, Bonsing BA, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ, de Herder WW, et al. Morbidity and mortality after pancreatic surgery in MEN1: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2019;106:1814–23. |
| 23. | Sahoo S, Sahoo S, Behera S, Sahoo AK, Mishra A, Mishra S. Occult insulinoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a case report. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10(3):e05535. |
| 24. | Al-Salameh A, Baudry C, Cohen R, Chanson P, Guedj AM, Pigny P, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with multiple endocrine tumors: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2018;2018:1–6. |
| 25. | Palomo M, Rivera X, Santamarina I. Recurrence of malignant insulinoma in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. 2025;2025(5):rjaf335. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf335 |