REVIEW ARTICLE

Management of musculoskeletal pain in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a review

Svetlana Kašiković Lečića,b, Jovan Javoraca,b,c, Dejan Živanovićc, Aleksandra Lovrenskia,d, Dragana Tegeltijaa,d, Jelena Zvekić Svorcane,f and Jadranka Maksimovićg

aInstitute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; bUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia; cCollege of Vocational Studies for the Education of Preschool Teachers and Sports Trainers, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Subotica, Serbia; dUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Novi Sad, Serbia; eSpecial Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Novi Sad, Serbia; fUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Novi Sad, Serbia; gInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

ABSTRACT

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, fibrotic, and fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD) of unknown etiology that primarily affects the elderly. Patients with IPF suffer from a heavy symptom burden and usually have a poor quality of life. Dyspnea and dry cough are predominant symptoms of IPF. Although pain is not considered one of the main symptoms of IPF, it can occur for a variety of reasons, such as hypoxia, coughing, muscle and nerve damage, deconditioning, and steroid use. The prevalence of pain in IPF patients varies greatly, ranging from around 30 to 80%, with the prevalence being estimated mostly among patients in the end-of-life period. It manifests itself in the form of muscle pain, joint discomfort, or back and chest pain. Approaches to the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain in patients with IPF include pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures that are also important to optimize the treatment of other symptoms (dyspnea and cough) and the optimal treatment of comorbidities. Given the scarcity of data on this symptom in the literature, this article summarizes what is currently known about the etiology and treatment of musculoskeletal pain in IPF.

KEYWORDS
IPF; dyspnea; cough; pain; treatment

 

Citation: UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022, 127, e8739
http://dx.doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v127.8739

Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Upsala Medical Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 25 April 2022; Revised: 16 June 2022; Accepted: 16 June 2022; Published: 11 July 2022

Competing interests and funding: The authors report no conflict of interest.
There was no funding involved.

CONTACT Jovan Javorac jovan.javorac@mf.uns.ac.rs

 

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown origin with a median survival of 3–5 years after diagnosis, which is similar or even worse than the time course of many malignancies (1). Lung fibrosis is defined by the replacement of the normal, compliant, elastin-rich lung extracellular matrix, with an aberrant matrix rich in fibrillar collagen (2). The pattern of alveolar lesions in IPF is consistent with the usual interstitial pneumonia (3). One of the defining features of IPF is its unpredictable clinical course, which can range from long periods of clinical stability to acute exacerbations with rapid decompensation (4). For some patients, the disease progresses rapidly. Others may experience a slow progression of the disease, in which their lung function remains stable for an extended period of time, and they live a considerably longer life (5). The majority of patients with IPF develop symptoms between the ages of 50 and 70, while IPF is seldom diagnosed in those under 50 years of age (5, 6). Patients with a long-term IPF may have a heavy symptom burden with breathing difficulties (dyspnea), a persistent dry cough and fatigue being the most prominent (79). Even though gradual, unintended weight loss, muscular pain (myalgias), or joint pain (arthralgias) are not very common and may indicate an alternative diagnosis (6), these symptoms may occur and contribute to a lower quality of life in patients with IPF.

At rest, IPF patients usually demonstrate restrictive pulmonary physiology with decreased forced vital capacity and total lung capacity, accompanied by impaired gas exchange as measured by the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (2). As the disease advances, lung compliance declines and lung volumes decrease (2, 5). Abnormal pulmonary gas exchange, inefficient breathing mechanics, exercise-induced hypoxemia, circulatory impairments, and respiratory and skeletal muscle dysfunction are all factors that impede exercise performance of patients with IPF, as they do in other chronic pulmonary diseases (10). Changes in lung mechanical characteristics, anomalies in the lung vasculature, and diffusion dysfunction all contribute to the early onset of chronic arterial hypoxemia during exercise and the later onset of chronic arterial hypoxemia at rest in IPF (2).

The aim of IPF treatment is to slow disease progression, reduce the frequency of acute exacerbations, increase survival, reduce symptoms, and improve overall health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Currently, two anti-fibrotic medications are approved for the treatment of IPF (pirfenidone and nintedanib) (8). They can slow disease progression but provide inadequate symptom relief (11). Similar to other progressive pulmonary diseases, IPF has psychological, social, and existential consequences, affecting overall quality of life (12). Alleviating symptoms and improving HR-QoL in patients with IPF are often a major challenge for clinicians. In a small minority of patients, lung transplantation is an option that can increase survival and improve health-related wellbeing (11, 13).

Because IPF is more common in older patients and smokers, these patients are more likely to have multiple comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, bronchiectasis, sleep apnea, pulmonary hypertension, lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary embolism, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GORD), depression, anxiety (14). These comorbidities must be carefully examined since they frequently increase symptom burden and may have a negative impact on functional status, quality of life, and prognosis (15). Treatment of comorbidities can be challenging: there is no evidence to treat pulmonary hypertension in IPF (16, 17), gastro-esophageal reflux therapy is a matter of debate (18), and lung cancer treatment is a major problem (19). Other comorbidities are treated similarly to patients without IPF (15).

The management of IPF is multifaceted, requiring collaboration among members of the healthcare team, family members, and caregivers to provide patient education and support, as well as management of symptoms, comorbidities, and palliative care (13). Musculoskeletal pain, while not the most common symptom, has a significant impact on the overall quality of life of patients with IPF. Therefore, we conducted a review of literature to summarize what is currently known about the etiology, frequency, and treatment of musculoskeletal pain in IPF.

Materials and methods

Using selected keywords (‘idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis’, ‘interstitial lung diseases’, ‘musculoskeletal pain’, ‘treatment’, ‘dyspnea’, ‘cough’, ‘quality of life’, and ‘palliative care’), we searched bibliographic databases PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar for available meta-analysis, literature, and systematic reviews, as well as clinical studies where the musculoskeletal pain in patients with IPF and ILDs, in general, was analyzed. The research included relevant literature sources, only in English, that had been published within a 12-year period (2000–2022) and that met the following inclusion criteria: number of citations, year of publication, and educational significance of available information in a particular manuscript. All identified studies are presented and discussed in a non-selective manner. A total of 91 bibliographic sources were used in writing this paper. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first literature review describing research into musculoskeletal pain in IPF.

Musculoskeletal pain in patients with IPF

Patients report that dyspnea, coughing, and fatigue have the greatest impact on their daily lives (7). Although pain is not considered one of the main symptoms of IPF, it can occur in some patients as chronic or frequent pain. Studies that evaluated the prevalence of pain in patients with IPF, its localization and mechanism of development, as well as modalities of pain management, are rare in the literature. The results they obtained were frequently inconsistent, indicating that pain in IPF is still understudied, and that future research should focus more on this symptom of the disease, which can contribute to the patient’s lower overall quality of life.

The prevalence and localization of musculoskeletal pain in IPF

The prevalence of pain in IPF patients has been investigated in a small number of studies, and the results vary, with estimates ranging from 30 to 80%. The variations in the results can be explained by the different methodological approaches used in the research, as well as the fact that the patients in the studies were at different stages of their disease. The majority of research on pain in IPF included patients in their end-of-live period. Thus, in a study conducted by Rajala et al. (20) and Ahmadi et al. (21), symptoms during the last week of patient’s life were evaluated, and pain was found in 31 and 51% of patients, respectively. In the retrospective assessment of patients with a progressive idiopathic fibrotic ILD, including IPF, generalized pain was found in 9%, while chest pain was reported by 29% of patients (22). In another study by Rajala et al. (23), with a more general IPF cohort of patients (the average duration of IPF was 3.9 years), pain in movement was reported by 82% of patients, whereas pain in rest occurred in 66%. The subjects of this study localized pain in their chest, head, and neck; upper limbs; stomach; back; pelvis; and lower limbs, or they stated that pain was extensive. One-third of patients complained of chest pain, which showed linear relationship with the severity of dyspnea as measured by the modified Medical Research Council score. Another study also found a correlation between pain intensity and dyspnea severity (24), while this relationship was not found in others (25). These variations could be attributed to the fact that different study population were at different stages of disease.

Etiology of musculoskeletal pain in IPF

Many patients cannot understand how a lung disease, such as IPF, can manifest into pain (often in the form of muscle pain, joint discomfort, or a sore back and chest). Some of the underlying causes of pain in patients with IPF are as follows:

Patients with advanced IPF develop hypoxia (reduction of oxygen levels in cells and tissues) due to multiple physiologic derangements, including diffusion limitation, ventilation-perfusion mismatching, and abnormalities of the pulmonary vasculature (2). Hypoxia may contribute to metabolic (lactic) acidosis in muscles, which can cause pain in the joints, muscles, and other parts of the body (10, 26). Hypoxia during exercise impairs maximal workload and endurance time (27).

Coughing is common in patients with IPF (4, 2729). The pathogenesis of cough in IPF is multifactorial and influenced by mechanical, biochemical, and neurosensory changes in the lungs, as well as patient’s comorbidities, such as COPD, GORD, obstructive sleep apnea, and cardiovascular diseases (28). Chronic cough is associated with impairments of several different aspects of the patient’s life, including poor sleep quality, limited exercise ability, decreased social interactions, and, eventually, musculoskeletal pain (28, 3032). However, there is a lack of information on the precise mechanisms by which cough causes musculoskeletal pain in patients with IPF or ILD in general. Several hypotheses can be proposed. It is known that both the inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscles are actively involved in the coughing process, as well as that extreme changes in intrathoracic pressure occur during this process due to the active contraction of these muscles (33). Chronic dry coughing and cough paroxysms, associated with dyspnea, may exhaust the respiratory muscles during the expansion and contraction of the thoracic cavity (34), leading to soreness in the shoulders, chest, and upper back. Sometimes, patients feel pain due to ribs injury caused by coughing (35).

Another and likely less common reason that can cause pain is muscle and nerve damage. Respiratory and limb muscle dysfunction can be caused by several different mechanisms, such as chronic lack of oxygen in the blood, inflammatory, and oxidative stress in the muscle; chronic corticosteroid administration; physical inactivity; ageing; and malnutrition (34). These claims are supported by the findings of several studies, where the force of quadriceps femoris muscle (36) or rectus femoris muscle (37) was reduced in patients with IPF. Chronic hypoxia may potentially cause nerve injury, but additional pathways for nerve damage have not been thoroughly examined. Given the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among IPF patients (38), as well as the effects of diabetes on the neurological system, the importance of this comorbidity in the management of pain in IPF patients must be considered.

Deconditioning or the reduced functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system can develop due to the disease. As IPF progresses, more and more of the lung tissue becomes scarred. The increased scarring leads to increased shortness of breath or breathlessness during activity. Patients naturally reduce their activity level and become deconditioned over time. Avoiding physical activities that provoke dyspnea and fatigue may be an important key factor of physical deconditioning and exercise intolerance (34). This can lead to muscle wasting, weakness, stiffness, and pain or discomfort during physical activity (39).

Guidelines recommend high-dose corticosteroid treatment in patients with acute exacerbations of IPF, despite unproven benefit (11, 40). Sometimes, corticosteroids are used for other reasons in patients with IPF (treatment of cough, dyspnea, and comorbidities). Corticosteroid-induced myopathy is the most common type of drug-induced myopathy, with an estimated incidence of 50–60% among patients who have been using corticosteroids for an extended period of time (41). It can affect both respiratory and peripheral muscles, resulting in muscle weakness and loss of muscle mass, accompanied sometimes with pain, cramps, or tightening sensation in the muscles (41, 42). The severity of corticosteroid-induced myopathy is determined by the type of steroid used, the treatment duration, the dose, and the treatment regimen, with repeated burst treatment effects being worse than those obtained with a continuous treatment with the same dose (43).

Some people diagnosed with IPF may experience pain due to other coexisting medical conditions, such as arthritis. Sometimes, digital clubbing (the tips of the fingers or toes become rounded and enlarged, resembling drumsticks) can be painful to some patients. Digital clubbing occurs due to a chronic lack of oxygen in the blood (44). The presence of associated cardiovascular diseases can cause and intensify the chest pain in patients with IPF (45). IPF is also linked to GORD, which can cause discomfort or burning in the chest (46, 47).

Chronic pain has biological, psychological, and societal consequences. IPF patients who suffer from chronic pain, like any other chronic pain patient, may be more prone to illness and injury, as well as depression, anxiety, and social isolation; all of which contribute to a lower quality of life (48). Pain can interfere with the patients’ participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation program (49).

How to treat pain associated with IPF?

In everyday clinical practice, patients may not associate musculoskeletal pain with their lung disease, so they may not report this symptom to their physician. Thus, clinicians should be encouraged to be more vigilant in asking patients about all symptoms, including pain, during examinations. Early detection, assessment, and treatment of symptoms related to disease progression, such as pain, are important. Palliative care can provide relief from the painful symptoms and stress that goes along with having IPF and can help improve quality of life of patients and their families (1, 4). A variety of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies are available to treat pain associated with IPF.

Pharmacologic treatment options

There is no therapy that is specifically designed to treat pain in IPF patients. The majority of treatments target other pain-related symptoms of IPF, such as cough, manage comorbidities that are associated with pain, or standard analgesics are used (primarily opioids, with no available literature data on the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs, or paracetamol).

When cough is present in IPF, it is severe and difficult to treat as it is often refractory (50). Cough treatment may alleviate the pain associated with continued hacking. Cough associated with IPF can be due to underlying lung disease or comorbidities. The first step in managing chronic cough in IPF is to rule out any potential comorbidities (27). The most common causes of chronic cough are asthma, postnasal drip syndrome, and acid reflux from the stomach (51). The less common causes include (viral) infections, eosinophilic bronchitis, pleural diseases, and the use of drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Treatment of comorbidities must be implemented before chronic cough may be considered directly linked to the underlying disease – IPF (49, 52). A recent multicenter prospective observational study of pirfenidone reported decreased objective cough without significant changes in quality of life (53). The beneficial effects of pirfenidone on cough in IPF patients were confirmed in several other studies (54, 55). There are limited data on nintedanib’s effects on cough in IPF patients. In the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, results suggested that nintedanib may prevent worsening of cough (56), while no clinically significant effect of nintedanib on cough was observed in INPULSIS trials with IPF patients (57). Conventional antitussive therapy is frequently ineffective (58). Among centrally active antitussives, opioids (codeine and morphine) are the most commonly used for this purpose, but with limited efficacy and often systemic side effects (50). The opinion that codeine is an effective cough suppressant is not supported by the available evidence (59). Antitussives have been studied in IPF only a few times and on a small basis. Despite the fact that thalidomide (60) and interferon-alpha (61) have been shown to improve cough in IPF patients, they are still not approved for this indication and are either extremely expensive for off-label use (thalidomide) or not commercially available (interferon-alpha). Because cough is one of the most prevalent symptoms reported by IPF patients and one of the factors contributing to their poor HR-QoL, it would be beneficial to incorporate cough outcome measures in future studies of new IPF medications. Based on therapeutic studies in the chronic non-IPF idiopathic cough population, future study should focus on medications that suppress the cough reflex, such as gabapentin, pregabalin amitriptyline, inhaled cromolyn sodium (PA101), or P2X3 inhibitors, which may provide cough alleviation in IPF as well (50, 62).

Opioids have been shown to be effective in reducing intensity of pain in a variety of chronic pain conditions (63). Individually titrated doses between 10 and 30 mg per day have showed to improve dyspnea, cough, and pain in patients with advanced IPF (64). In general, the lowest form of morphine tablet or equivalent is 5 mg, which may not be tolerated by the elderly. Because morphine is available in very low doses of 1 mg/mL in liquid form, clinician can start with minimal doses and gradually titrate over longer periods of time to monitor adverse drug reactions and treatment response (65). When prescribing these medications in the elderly, certain factors other than comorbidities should be considered, such as an increase in the pain threshold and a physiological decline in hepatic and renal function, which may affect the pharmacocinetic of analgesics, including the onset of action, elimination rate, and half-life of the drug (66). Opioid-related adverse effects (primarily constipation, nausea, dizziness, and somnolence) are well documented in the literature and should be managed conservatively (67). Even though the use of opiates to treat IPF symptoms is still controversial, it should be considered when the patients’ quality of life is severely impaired if there are no other treatment options available (62).

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used to treat mild-to-moderate musculoskeletal pain (68). They alleviate the pain by decreasing the activity of cyclooxygenase enzymes and inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis, but they also increase the risk of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal adverse events (69). Another issue with their use is that due to comorbidities and contraindications, they are frequently ineffective in elderly and severely ill patients (70). Topical NSAIDs were found to be more effective than oral formulations in the management of pain in osteoarthritis, with fewer adverse events, but this effect was not seen in other conditions accompanied by musculoskeletal pain (71). Paracetamol is one of the most commonly used medications for pain and fever, with effective analgesic and antipyretic effects, and minor gastrointestinal, renal, and vascular adverse effects. Despite reports of paracetamol-associated acute liver injury, paracetamol remains a preferred analgesic, particularly for elderly and frail patients (70). In everyday clinical practice, it is evident that IPF patients typically use NSAIDs or paracetamol to relieve their musculoskeletal pain. However, we did not find any study in the literature that investigated the effect of these drugs on pain relief in IPF or any other ILD. Therefore, this is unarguably one of the issues that should be addressed in future research.

Currently, there is no evidence to support the use of high-dose steroids (62). When considering it as a possible treatment for pain in IPF, it should be taken into account that high doses of steroids have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality in IPF (58, 72), as well as their potential adverse effects. Oral corticosteroids have been shown to be effective in improving cough in one study of six IPF patients (58), with reduced cough symptoms on a visual analogue scale and reduced cough sensitivity to inhaled capsaicin and substance P. Low doses of prednisone are sometimes prescribed in daily practice for this purpose and are then gradually tapered if they are beneficial (22, 27), but this is not recommended in CHEST guideline and expert panel report on the treatment of ILD-associated cough (62). However, in some studies, no effects of corticosteroids on cough were reported (73), so the use of corticosteroids for this indication is still controversial and requires future investigations.

Thalidomide has been shown to reduce cough in IPF patients. This drug has anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic effects, similar to currently used anti-fibrotic drugs (27), but with potentially severe side effects such as constipation, venous thromboembolism, skin rash, dizziness, malaise, and peripheral neuropathy (suggesting that it may also have effects on sensory nerves) (74). Thalidomide should not be considered a routine treatment for cough in IPF, even as a second-line therapy, until further evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio has been undertaken (60, 62).

As previously speculated, hypoxia that occurs during the course of IPF may lead to musculoskeletal pain in these patients. Therefore, supplemental oxygen therapy may alleviate pain in IPF patients (75). There are no studies in the literature that investigated the effects of supplemental oxygen therapy on pain reduction in IPF patients. The IPF clinical practice guidelines, on the other hand, make a strong recommendation for the use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in patients with advanced lung disease and with clinically significant resting hypoxemia (5). Supplemental oxygen therapy has been empirically shown to have some beneficial effects on cough, which may have an indirect impact on pain in these patients (22). Studies on oxygen use in IPF patients are generally limited, and there is no data demonstrating the benefit of supplemental oxygen therapy for all patients with IPF. Patients who may benefit from LTOT are classified as either those who benefit from oxygen at rest (will be treated with LTOT) or those who benefit from oxygen during exertion (75). For patients who are breathless on exertion and have a desaturation on exertion <90%, ambulatory oxygen should be considered if this leads to improved exercise capacity or reduced breathlessness. Oxygen administration is associated with decreased exertional dyspnea and improved exercise capacity by increasing cardiac output and arterial oxygen content (76, 77).

Non-pharmacologic treatment options

Given that pharmacological treatments for the management of pain in IPF patients are very limited, and often ineffective, non-pharmacologic interventions serve as an important therapeutic tool for symptomatic management. The most important non-pharmacological option is pulmonary rehabilitation, but other methods may be beneficial.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended in the IPF guidelines as a possible supportive therapy (5). The main components of pulmonary rehabilitation are exercise training, breathing therapy, smoking cessation, education and motivation, nutritional interventions, and psychosocial support. These therapeutic components differ individually and are dependent on the patients’ specific health status and personal goals (78). The goals of pulmonary rehabilitation management in IPF include the following: optimizing alveolar ventilation and lung volumes and capacities; reducing the work of breathing; maximizing aerobic capacity and efficiency of oxygen transport; optimizing physical endurance and exercise capacity, as well as general muscle strength and thereby peripheral oxygen extraction. The role of pulmonary rehabilitation in pain reduction can be seen in these goals, as it influences certain mechanisms that lead to pain, such as tissue hypoxia, nerve and muscle damage, and deconditioning. Some studies have also found some benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation on cough reduction, which can indirectly also affect pain in IPF patients (79).

Exercise training is an important part of pulmonary rehabilitation in IPF, since it improves exercise performance and overall health (80). Skeletal muscle dysfunction is a cardinal feature of IPF and is associated with severe exertional dyspnea and fatigue, as well as pain and poor HR-QoL (39). Exercise reduces musculoskeletal pain by decreasing ion channel expression, increasing the expression of endogenous analgesic substances (neurotrophins) in exercising muscle, and changing local immune cell function (increased anti-inflammatory cytokines) (81). According to the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, pulmonary rehabilitation with exercise training is recommended for chronic respiratory diseases including ILD and IPF, providing both short- and long-term benefits (82). A recent systematic review concluded that exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation is a safe and effective treatment for IPF patients, suggesting its prescription as standard care for these patients (83). Pulmonary rehabilitation improves sustained submaximal exercise capacity and anaerobic threshold in patients with IPF, reduces exercise-induced lactic acidosis, and increases oxidative enzyme activity in peripheral muscles (84), all of which can reduce the intensity of musculoskeletal pain.

Exercise training may be challenging to implement in IPF due to severe signs and symptoms experienced by the patients, particularly during exercise. Accordingly, several studies found that mild-moderate IPF patients adapted better to exercise training programs than severe IPF patients (85). Therefore, the emphasis in pulmonary rehabilitation is on supervised and safe exercise to improve functional capacity, as well as instructing and motivating patients to maintain home-based follow-up training modalities to retain the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (86).

Interventional exercise training studies in IPF exhibit variability in the training protocols and research methods used (28). The majority of them combined aerobic exercise (walking or cycling or both) with resistance and flexibility exercises for peripheral skeletal muscles (8791). Some programs also included respiratory muscle training or breathing exercises (87, 88, 90). Breathing and balance exercises can also be beneficial for patient’s overall health (87).

The majority of the studies followed the established COPD guidelines for exercise training in the pulmonary rehabilitation program. These guidelines might be less appropriate for IPF due to different pathophysiological mechanisms of exercise limitation and, therefore, may not provide optimal exercise stimuli and adaptation to training (82). Further research in large randomized controlled trials should address different training modalities in order to optimize the exercise training programs for IPF. It should be carefully considered whether supervised exercise training-based pulmonary rehabilitation programs should be recommended as the standard of care for IPF patients.

Patient education should be prioritized among other non-pharmacological pain treatments. Patients’ central pain processing can be altered by educating them about pain mechanisms and challenging maladaptive pain cognitions and/or behaviors. The goal of education and cognitive-behavioral therapy is to change beliefs and behaviors that contribute to pain, fear, catastrophizing, and anxiety (81). Non-pharmacological interventions such as speech pathology therapy and Physiotherapy and Speech and Language Intervention have also been shown to be effective in reducing chronic cough, potentially impacting pain in IPF patients (62).

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first narrative review that had addressed musculoskeletal pain in IPF patients. We could not find any original research that focused only on pain in these patients, as well. Musculoskeletal pain, on the other hand, is reported by one-third to two-thirds of IPF patients, indicating that it is a clearly understudied and underestimated problem. Alleviating symptoms and improving HR-QoL in IPF are often major challenges to treating clinicians. Because current therapeutic options are limited, patients with IPF require multidisciplinary care that includes disease education, communication, symptom management, and supportive care. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation, present the cornerstone for symptom management. Pharmacological therapies (medications) can also alleviate severe symptoms, such as dyspnea, cough, and pain, but there is no single agent that is specifically designed to treat pain in IPF. Another point to emphasize is the presence of comorbidities, which can influence symptoms and should be considered for pain treatment. Further research is needed to get a better estimate of the prevalence, underlying mechanisms, severity, and pain predictors in IPF, as well as the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options.

Notes on contributors

Svetlana Kašiković Lečić, MD, PhD, is an internal medicine specialist and pulmonologist in the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia, and an associate professor in the Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Jovan Javorac, MD, PhD Candidate, is an internal medicine resident in the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia, an associate researcher in the Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia, and a teaching assistant in the Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, College of Vocational Studies for the Education of Preschool Teachers and Sports Trainers, Subotica, Serbia.

Dejan Živanović, RN, PhD, is a clinical nursing specialist and teaching assistant in the Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, College of Vocational Studies for the Education of Preschool Teachers and Sports Trainers, Subotica, Serbia.

Aleksandra Lovrenski, MD, PhD, is a pathologist in the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia, and an assistant professor in the Dept. of Pathology, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Dragana Tegeltija, MD, PhD, is a pathologist in the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia, and an assistant professor in the Dept. of Pathology, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Jelena Zvekić Svorcan, MD, PhD, is a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist and rheumatologist in the Special Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Novi Sad, Serbia, and an assistant professor in the Dept. of Medical Rehabilitation, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Jadranka Maksimović, MD, PhD, is an epidemiologist in the Institute of Epidemiology, Belgrade, and an associate professor in the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

ORCID

Svetlana Kašiković Lečić symbol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-6121

Jovan Javorac symbol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8567-8974

Dejan Živanović symbol https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8232-9368

Aleksandra Lovrenski symbol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5278-6194

Dragana Tegeltija symbol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-6644

Jelena Zvekić Svorcan symbol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-4351

Jadranka Maksimović symbol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-7399

References

  1. Akiyama N, Fujisawa T, Morita T, Mori K, Yasui H, Hozumi H, et al. Palliative care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients: pulmonary physicians’ view. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020;60:933–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.012
  2. Plantier L, Cazes A, Dinh-Xuan AT, Bancal C, Marchand-Adam S, Crestani B. Physiology of the lung in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev 2018;27:170062. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0062-2017
  3. Diridollou T, Sohier L, Rousseau C, Angibaud A, Chauvin P, Gaignon T, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: significance of the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) CT-scan patterns defined in new international guidelines. Respir Med Res 2020;77:72–8. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2020.02.004
  4. Zou RH, Kass DJ, Gibson KF, Lindell KO. The role of palliative care in reducing symptoms and improving quality of life for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a review. Pulm Ther 2020;6:35–46. doi: 10.1007/s41030-019-00108-2
  5. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DJ, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198:e44–68. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST
  6. Spagnolo P, Sverzellati N, Rossi G, Cavazza A, Tzouvelekis A, Crestani B, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an update. Ann Med 2015;47: 15–27. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2014.982165
  7. Hewson T, McKeever TM, Gibson JE, Navaratnam V, Hubbard RB, Hutchinson JP. Timing of onset of symptoms in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax 2018;73:683–5. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210177
  8. Rozenberg D, Sitzer N, Porter S, Weiss A, Colman R, Reid WD, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a review of disease, pharmacological, and nonpharmacological strategies with a focus on symptoms, function, and health-related quality of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020;59:1362–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.364
  9. Lancaster L, Bonella F, Inoue Y, Cottin V, Siddall J, Small M, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: physician and patient perspectives on the pathway to care from symptom recognition to diagnosis and disease burden. Respirology 2022;27:66–75. doi: 10.1111/resp.14154
  10. Vogiatzis I, Zakynthinos G, Andrianopoulos V. Mechanisms of physical activity limitation in chronic lung diseases. Pulm Med 2012;2012:634761. doi: 10.1155/2012/634761
  11. Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, Garcia CA, Azuma A, Behr J, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline. J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:e3–19. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201506-1063ST
  12. Kreuter M, Swigris J, Pittrow D, Geier S, Klotsche J, Prasse A, et al. The clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and its association to quality of life over time: longitudinal data from the INSIGHTS-IPF registry. Respir Res 2019;20:59. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1020-3
  13. Pleasants R, Tighe RM. Management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Pharmacother 2019;53:1238–48. doi: 10.1177/1060028019862497
  14. Caminati A, Madotto F, Conti S, Cesana G, Mantovani L, Harari S. The natural history of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in a large European population: the role of age, sex and comorbidities. Intern Emerg Med 2021;16:1793–802. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02651-w
  15. Caminati A, Lonati C, Cassandro R, Elia D, Pelosi G, Torre O, et al. Comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an underestimated issue. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28:190044. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2019
  16. Kang J, Song JW. Effect of sildenafil added to antifibrotic treatment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep 2021;11:17824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97396-z
  17. Kolb M, Raghu G, Wells AU, Behr J, Richeldi L, Schinzel B, et al. Nintedanib plus sildenafil in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Eng J Med 2018;379:1722–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811737
  18. Kreuter M, Raghu G. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the heart burn in patients with IPF can no longer be silent. Eur Respir J 2018;51:1800921. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00921-2018
  19. Koo HJ, Do KH, Lee JB, Alblushi S, Lee SM. Lung cancer in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0161437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161437
  20. Rajala K, Lehto JT, Saarinen M, Sutinen E, Saarto T, Myllärniemi M. End-of-life care of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMC Palliat Care 2016;15:85. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0158-8
  21. Ahmadi Z, Wysham NG, Lundström S, Janson C, Currow DC, Ekström M. End-of-life care in oxygen-dependent ILD compared with lung cancer: a national population-based study. Thorax 2016;71:510–16. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207439
  22. Bajwah S. Specialist palliative care is more than drugs: a retrospective study of ILD patients. Lung. 2012;190:215–20. doi: 10.1007/s00408-011-9355-7
  23. Rajala K, Lehto JT, Sutinen E, Kautiainen H, Myllärniemi M, Saarto T. mMRC dyspnoea scale indicates impaired quality of life and increased pain in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. ERJ Open Res 2017;3:00084-2017. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00084-2017
  24. Yount SE, Beaumont JL, Chen SY, Kaiser K, Wortman K, Van Brunt DL, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lung 2016;194:227–34. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9850-y
  25. Martinez TY, Pereira CA, dos Santos ML, Ciconelli RM, Guimarães SM, Martinez JA. Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2000;117:1627–32. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.6.1627
  26. Kucuk A, Cumhur Cure M, Cure E. Can COVID-19 cause myalgia with a completely different mechanism? A hypothesis. Clin Rheumatol 2020;39:2103–4. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05178-1
  27. van Manen MJ, Birring SS, Vancheri C, Cottin V, Renzoni EA, Russell A-M, et al. Cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev 2016;25:278–86. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0090-2015
  28. Vainshelboim B. Exercise training in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: is it of benefit? Breathe (Sheff) 2016;12:130–8. doi: 10.1183/20734735.006916
  29. Wakwaya Y, Ramdurai D, Swigris JJ. How we do it: managing cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2021;160:1774–82. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.071
  30. Booth S, Johnson MJ. Improving the quality of life of people with advanced respiratory disease and severe breathlessness. Breathe 2019;15:199–215. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0200-2019
  31. Lindell KO, Kavalieratos D, Gibson KF, Tycon L, Rosenzweig M. The palliative care needs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a qualitative study of patients and family caregivers. Heart Lung 2017;46:24–9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.10.002
  32. Irwin RS. Complications of cough. Chest 2006;129:54S–8S. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.54s
  33. George L, Rehman SU, Khan FA. Diaphragmatic rupture: a complication of violent cough. Chest 2000;117:1200–1. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.4.1200
  34. Panagiotou M, Polychronopoulos V, Strange C. Respiratory and lower limb muscle function in interstitial lung disease. Chron Respir Dis 2016;13:162–72. doi: 10.1177/1479972315626014
  35. Farinacci-Vilaró M, Gerena-Montano L, Nieves-Figueroa H, Garcia-Puebla J, Fernández R, Hernández R, et al. Chronic cough causing unexpected diaphragmatic hernia and chest wall rupture. Radiol Case Rep 2019;15:15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2019.10.010
  36. Nishiyama O, Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y, Kimura T, Ogawa T, Watanabe F, et al. Quadriceps weakness is related to exercise capacity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2005;127:2028–33. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2028
  37. de Paula WD, Rodrigues MP, Ferreira NMC, Passini VV, Melo-Silva CA. Noninvasive assessment of peripheral skeletal muscle weakness in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a pilot study with multiparametric MRI of the rectus femoris muscle. Multidiscip Respir Med 2020;15:707. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2020.707
  38. Wang D, Ma Y, Tong X, Zhang Y, Fan H. Diabetes mellitus contributes to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a review from clinical appearance to possible pathogenesis. Front Public Health 2020;8:196. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00196
  39. Holland AE. Exercise limitation in interstitial lung disease – mechanisms, significance and therapeutic options. Chron Respir Dis 2010;7:101–11. doi: 10.1177/1479972309354689
  40. Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, Jenkins G, Kondoh Y, Lederer DJ, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An international working group report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:265–75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0801CI
  41. Surmachevska N, Tiwari V. Corticosteroid induced myopathy. StatPearls, ed. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
  42. Doughty CT, Amato AA. Toxic myopathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2019;25:1712–1731. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000806
  43. Hanada M, Ishimatsu Y, Sakamoto N, Nagura H, Oikawa M, Morimoto Y, et al. Corticosteroids are associated with reduced skeletal muscle function in interstitial lung disease patients with mild dyspnea. Respir Med 2020;174:106184. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106184
  44. van Manen MJG, Vermeer LC, Moor CC, Vrijenhoeff R, Grutters JC, Veltkamp M, et al. Clubbing in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Respir Med 2017;132:226–31. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.10.021
  45. Raghu G, Amatto VC, Behr J, Stowasser S. Comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients: a systematic literature review. Eur Respir J 2015;46:1113–30. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02316-2014
  46. Herbella FAM, Patti MG. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and idiopathic lung fibrosis. From heartburn to lung transplant, and beyond. Am Surg 2022;88:297–302. doi: 10.1177/0003134821998686
  47. Wang Z, Bonella F, Li W, Boerner EB, Guo Q, Kong X, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Uncertainties and controversies. Respiration 2018;96:571–87. doi: 10.1159/000492336
  48. IsHak WW, Wen RY, Naghdechi L, Vanle B, Dang J, Knosp M, et al. Pain and depression: a systematic review. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2018;26:352–63. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000198
  49. Millan-Billi P, Serra C, Alonso Leon A, Castillo D. Comorbidities, complications and non-pharmacologic treatment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Med Sci (Basel) 2018;6:59. doi: 10.3390/medsci6030059
  50. Vigeland CL, Hughes AH, Horton MR. Etiology and treatment of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med 2017;123:98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.12.016
  51. Morice AH. Chronic cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the same difference? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022;205:985–6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0083ED
  52. Bargagli E, Di Masi M, Perruzza M, Vietri L, Bergantini L, Torricelli E, et al. The pathogenic mechanisms of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Emerg Med 2019;14:39–43. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1960-5
  53. van Manen MJG, Birring SS, Vancheri C, Vindigni V, Renzoni E, Russell AM, et al. Effect of pirfenidone on cough in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2017;50:1701157. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01157-2017
  54. Azuma A, Taguchi Y, Ogura T, Ebina M, Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y, et al. Exploratory analysis of a phase III trial of pirfenidone identifies a subpopulation of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as benefiting from treatment. Respir Res 2011;12:143. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-143
  55. Wijsenbeek MS, Van Beek FT, Geel AL, Van Den Toorn L, Boomars KA, Van Den Blink B, et al. Pirfenidone in daily clinical use in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the Netherlands. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:A4340.
  56. Kreuter M, Swigris JJ, Richeldi L, Wijsenbeek M, Nunes H, Suda T, et al. Effects of nintedanib on dyspnoe, cough and quality of life in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: findings from the INBUILD trial. Pneumologie 2021;75:S24. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723308
  57. Bonella F, Wuyts WA, Vancheri C, Russell AM, Lievens D, Stansen W, et al. Effects of nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and varying severities of cough. Pneumologie 2022;76:S20–1. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1747732
  58. Hope-Gill BD, Hilldrup S, Davies C, Newton RP, Harrison NK. A study of the cough reflex in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:995–1002. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200304-597OC
  59. Singu B, Verbeeck RK. Should codeine still be considered a WHO essential medicine? J Pharm Pharm Sci 2021;24:329–35. doi: 10.18433/jpps31639
  60. Horton MR, Santopietro V, Mathew L, Horton KM, Polito AJ, Liu MC, et al. Thalidomide for the treatment of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:398–406. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00003
  61. Lutherer LO, Nugent KM, Schoettle BW, Cummins MJ, Raj R, Birring SS, et al. Low-dose oral interferon α possibly retards the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and alleviates associated cough in some patients. Thorax 2011;66:446–7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.135947
  62. Birring SS, Kavanagh JE, Irwin RS, Keogh KA, Lim KG, Ryu JH, et al. Treatment of interstitial lung disease associated cough: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2018;154:904–17. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.06.038
  63. Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A, Tunks E. Opioids for chronic noncancer paIn: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. Can Med Assoc J 2006;174:1589–94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051528
  64. Allen S, Raut S, Woollard J, Vassallo M. Low dose diamorphine reduces breathlessness without causing a fall in oxygen saturation in elderly patients with end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Palliat Med 2005;19:128–30. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm998oa
  65. Lee J, Lakha SF, Mailis A. Efficacy of low-dose oral liquid morphine for elderly patients with chronic non-cancer paIn: retrospective chart review. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2015;2:369–76. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0048-z
  66. Pergolizzi J, Böger RH, Budd K, Dahan A, Erdine S, Hans G, et al. Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an international expert panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone). Pain Pract 2008;8:287–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x
  67. Winn AN, Check DK, Farkas A, Fergestrom NM, Neuner JM, Roberts AW. Association of current opioid use with serious adverse events among older adult survivors of breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2016858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16858
  68. Rasu RS, Sohraby R, Cunningham L, Knell ME. Assessing chronic pain treatment practices and evaluating adherence to chronic pain clinical guidelines in outpatient practices in the United States. J Pain 2013;14:568–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.01.425
  69. Machado GC, Abdel-Shaheed C, Underwood M, Day RO. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for musculoskeletal pain. BMJ 2021;372:n104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n104
  70. Freo U, Ruocco C, Valerio A, Scagnol I, Nisoli E. Paracetamol: a review of guideline recommendations. J Clin Med 2021;10:3420. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153420
  71. Derry S, Conaghan P, Da Silva JA, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;4:CD007400. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007400.pub3
  72. Flaherty K, Toews G, Lynch JP 3rd, Kazerooni E, Gross B, Strawerman R, et al. Steroids in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a prospective assessment of adverse reactions, response to therapy and survival. Am J Med 2001;110:278–82. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00711-7
  73. Key AL, Holt K, Hamilton A, Smith JA, Earis JE. Objective cough frequency in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cough 2010;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1745-9974-6-4
  74. Newfield C. New medical indications for thalidomide and its derivatives. Sci J Lander Coll Arts Sci 2018;12:3.
  75. Khor YH, Renzoni EA, Visca D, McDonald CF, Goh NSL. Oxygen therapy in COPD and interstitial lung disease: navigating the knowns and unknowns. ERJ Open Res 2019;16:00118-2019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00118-2019
  76. Alfieri V, Crisafulli E, Visca D, Chong WH, Stock C, Mori L, et al. Physiological predictors of exertional oxygen desaturation in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J 2020;55:1901681. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01681-2019
  77. Chang CH, Lin HC, Yang CH, Gan ST, Huang CH, Chung FT, et al. Factors associated with exercise-induced desaturation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2020;15:2643–52. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S272511
  78. Kenn K, Gloeckl R, Heinzelmann I, Kneidinger N. Nonpharmacological interventions: rehabilitation, palliative care and transplantation. In: Costabel U, Crestani B, Wells A, eds. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lausanne, CH: ERS Publications; 2016, p. 231–42. doi: 10.1183/2312508X.10006315
  79. Patel AS, Watkin G, Willig B, Mutalithas K, Bellas H, Garrod R, et al. Improvement in health status following cough-suppression physiotherapy for patients with chronic cough. Chron Respir Dis 2011;8:253–8. doi: 10.1177/1479972311422547
  80. Emtner M, Hallin R, Arnardottir RH, Janson C. Effect of physical training on fat-free mass in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Ups J Med Sci 2015;120:52–8. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2014.990124
  81. Chimenti RL, Frey-Law LA, Sluka KA. A mechanism-based approach to physical therapist management of pain. Phys Ther 2018;98:302–14. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy030
  82. Hanada M, Kasawara KT, Mathur S, Rozenberg D, Kozu R, Hassan SA, et al. Aerobic and breathing exercises improve dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:1041–55. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.27
  83. Vainshelboim B. Clinical improvement and effectiveness of exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a brief analytical review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2021;41: 52–7. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000544
  84. Arizono S, Taniguchi H, Sakamoto K, Kondoh Y, Kimura T, Kataoka K, et al. Endurance time is the most responsive exercise measurement in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Care 2014;59:1108–15. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02674
  85. Bajwah S, Colquitt J, Loveman E, Bausewein C, Almond H, Oluyase A, et al. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve symptom control, functional exercise capacity and quality of life in interstitial lung disease: an evidence synthesis. ERJ Open Res 2021;7:00107-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00107-2020
  86. Wallaert B, Duthoit L, Drumez E, Behal H, Wemeau L, Chenivesse C, et al. Long-term evaluation of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. ERJ Open Res 2019;5:00045-2019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00045-2019
  87. Vainshelboim B, Oliveira J, Yehoshua L, Weiss I, Fox BD, Fruchter O, et al. Exercise training-based pulmonary rehabilitation program is clinically beneficial for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiration 2014;88: 378–88. doi: 10.1159/000367899
  88. Ozalevli S, Karaali HK, Ilgin D, Ucan ES. Effect of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Multidiscip Respir Med 2010;5:31–7. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-5-1-31
  89. Huppmann P, Sczepanski B, Boensch M, Winterkamp S, Schönheit-Kenn U, Neurohr C, et al. Effects of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J 2013;42:444–53. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00081512
  90. Jastrzebski D, Gumola A, Gawlik R, Kozielski J. Dyspnea and quality of life in patients with pulmonary fibrosis after six weeks of respiratory rehabilitation. J Physiol Pharmacol 2006;57:139–48.
  91. Holland AE, Hill CJ, Glaspole I, Goh N, McDonald CF. Predictors of benefit following pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease. Respir Med 2012;106:429–35. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.11.014