Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor?

  • Ji-Feng Feng
  • Ying Huang
  • Qiang Zhao

Abstract

Background. Several researchers have determined the tumor length to be an important prognostic indictor of esophageal cancer (EC). However, controversy exists concerning the optimal cut-off points for tumor length to predict overall survival. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of tumor length and propose the optimum cut-off point for tumor length in predicting survival difference in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods. From January 2001 to December 2009, a retrospective analysis of 132 consecutive patients older than 70 years with ESCC was conducted. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for survival prediction was plotted to verify the optimum cut-off point for tumor length. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic parameters for survival.

Results. A ROC curve for survival prediction was plotted to verify the optimum cut-off point for tumor length, which was 4.0 cm. Patients with tumor length £4.0 cm had significantly better 5-year survival rate than patients with a tumor length >4.0 cm (60.7% versus 31.6%, P = 0.007). Multivariate analyses showed that tumor length (>4.0 cm versus £4.0 cm, P = 0.036), differentiation (poor versus well/moderate, P = 0.032), N staging (N1-3 versus N0, P = 0.018), and T grade (T3-4 versus T1-2, P = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion. Tumor length is a predictive factor for long-term survival in elderly patients with ESCC, especially in T3-4 grade or nodal-negative patients. We conclude that 4.0 cm may be the optimum cut-off point for tumor length in predicting survival in elderly patients with ESCC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2013-04-26
How to Cite
Feng J.-F., Huang Y., & Zhao Q. (2013). Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor?. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 118(3). https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.792887
Section
Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)