Peroperative Staging of Renal Carcinoma:

Åke  Fritjofsson; Anders  Hemmingsson; Per Gunnar  Lindgren; Stig  Reinholdsson

doi:10.3109/03009738509178645

Peroperative Staging of Renal Carcinoma

A methodologic comparison

Åke Fritjofsson Departments of Urology and Diagnostic Radiology, Uniwrsity Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Anders Hemmingsson Departments of Urology and Diagnostic Radiology, Uniwrsity Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Per Gunnar Lindgren Departments of Urology and Diagnostic Radiology, Uniwrsity Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Stig Reinholdsson Departments of Urology and Diagnostic Radiology, Uniwrsity Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/03009738509178645

Abstract

Angiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography were compared with respect to staging of renal carcinoma in 41 patients with 46 renal tumours. Angiography and ultrasonography gave correct staging in 52% and 48%, respectively, while correct staging was achieved with computed tomography in 80% of the tumours.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Download PDF

Published

1985-06-01

How to Cite

Fritjofsson Åke, Hemmingsson A., Lindgren P. G., & Reinholdsson S. (1985). Peroperative Staging of Renal Carcinoma: A methodologic comparison. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 90(2), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009738509178645

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 90 No. 2 (1985): Upsala J Med Sci

Section

Original Articles

Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Upsala Medical Society. Read the full Copyright- and Licensing Statement.