Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Uppsala University Hospital 2009–2023: outcomes and temporal trends

  • Elisa de Wilde Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden; and Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1822-7997
  • Leonardo Olivetti Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Swedish Centre for Impacts of Climate Extremes (climes), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4904-4362
  • Stefan James Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden; and Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-9736
  • Christina Christersson Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden; and Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-8084
  • Sergio Buccheri Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden; and Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7767-3073
  • Rickard Lindblom Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-4981
  • Azad Amin Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Giovanna Sarno Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden; and Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-8281
Keywords: Aortic stenosis, TAVI, registry, mortality, survival analysis

Abstract

Background: In recent years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has rapidly emerged as a key treatment option for aortic stenosis. TAVI has been performed at Uppsala University Hospital since 2009. Data on TAVI procedures have been collected in a nation-wide all-comer registry, the Swedish Transcatheter Cardiac Intervention Registry (SWENTRY). However, only limited analysis has been conducted on trends in short- and long-term outcomes of TAVI patients in Sweden.

Methods: This registry-based cohort study aims to evaluate outcome trends and long-term prognosis in patients who underwent TAVI in a Swedish single center between 2009 and 2023. Survival outcomes were studied using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics over time.

Results: In total, 1,741 TAVI procedures were performed between 2009 and 2023. Immediate procedural mortality and 1-year mortality averaged at 0.9 and 8.1%, respectively. Both procedural and long-term mortality showed a decreasing trend over time. Similar results were observed when controlling for comorbidities and age.

Conclusions: Short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis have been constantly improving for patients undergoing TAVI within this study. Similar mortality and complication trends have been observed in other registry studies. These trends may be attributed to improvements in the quality of care, and the increased use of TAVI in lower risk patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Bärwolf C, Levang OW, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–43. doi: 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00201-X

2. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. For the PARTNER investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232

3. Horstkotte D, Loogen F. The natural history of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 1988;9:57–64. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/9.suppl_E.57

4. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. For the PARTNER trial investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2187–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510

5. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1790–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400590

6. Carroll JD, Mack MJ, Vemulapalli S, Herrmann HC, Gleason TG, Hanzel G, et al. STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2492–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595

7. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, et al. for the PARTNER 3 investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1695–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052

8. Thyregod HGH, Ihlemann N, Jørgensen TH, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, et al. Five-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes from the NOTION randomized clinical trial in patients at lower surgical risk. Circulation. 2019;139:2714–23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036606

9. Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Kleiman NS, Søndergaard L, Mumtaz M, et al. for the SURTAVI investigators. Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1321–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456

10. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395

11. Mauri V, Abdel-Wahab M, Bleiziffer S, Veulemans V, Sedaghat A, Adam M, et al. Temporal trends of TAVI treatment characteristics in high volume centers in Germany 2013–2020. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022;111:881–8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01963-3

12. Baumgartner H, Walther T. Aortic stenosis. In: ESC CardioMed. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2018, pp. 1641–58. Available from: https://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780198784906.001.0001/med-9780198784906-chapter-766 [cited 3 January 2025].

13. Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E, Linke A, Sievert H, Eggebrecht H, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:198–204. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq339

14. Eltchaninoff H, Prat A, Gilard M, Leguerrier A, Blanchard D, Fournial G, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: early results of the FRANCE (French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards) registry. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:191–7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq261

15. Walther T, Hamm CW, Schuler G, Berkowitsch A, Kötting J, Mangner N, et al. Perioperative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve replacements: prospective data from the GARY registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2173–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.034

16. Ludman PF, Moat N, de Belder MA, Blackman DJ, Duncan A, Banya W, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom: temporal trends, predictors of outcome, and 6-year follow-up: a report from the UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Registry, 2007 to 2012. Circulation. 2015;131:1181–90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013947

17. Kjønås D, Dahle G, Schirmer H, Malm S, Eidet J, Aaberge L, et al. Predictors of early mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Open Heart. 2019;6:e000936. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2018-000936.

18. Iung B, Laouénan C, Himbert D, Eltchaninoff H, Chevreul K, Donzeau-Gouge P, et al. Predictive factors of early mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: individual risk assessment using a simple score. Heart. 2014;100:1016–23. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305314

19. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Kashani K. The impact of frailty on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Trans Med. 2017;5:144. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.01.35

20. SWEDEHEART. Annual report 2023. Linköping: Peter Vasko, Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital; 2023. Report No.: ISSN 2000-1843.

21. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2403–18. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs255

22. Bjursten H, Rasmussen M, Nozohoor S, Götberg M, Olaison L, Rück A, et al. Infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a nationwide study. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3263–9. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz588.

23. Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1706–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885
Published
2025-02-28
How to Cite
de Wilde , E., Olivetti , L., James , S., Christersson , C., Buccheri , S., Lindblom , R., Amin , A., & Sarno , G. (2025). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Uppsala University Hospital 2009–2023: outcomes and temporal trends. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 130, e10999. https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v130.10999
Section
Original Articles