Avoidable injuries after intervention for abdominal aortic aneurysm: An analysis of negligence claims over 15 years in Sweden

David Bergqvist; Pelle Gustafson; Larsolof Hafström

doi:10.48101/ujms.v130.12171

David Bergqvist Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Academic Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Pelle Gustafson Swedish National Patient Insurance Company, Stockholm, Sweden
Larsolof Hafström Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v130.12171

Keywords: Aortic aneurysm, surgery, endovascular treatment, complications, adverse events, negligence

Abstract

Background: Patients, who are subjected to a patient's injury, are legally allowed a compensation for their suffering.

Aim: The negligence claims after surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) registered in the National Swedish patient insurance company (Landstingens Ömsesidiga Försäkringsbolag [LÖF]) between 2006 and 2020 were analyzed. More than 95% of negligence claims are covered by LÖF. Special emphasis on avoidable or unavoidable injuries was made.

Material: In 15 years 17,000 abdominal aortic interventions were recorded in the Swedish vascular register (SWEDVASC), where vascular interventions in the whole country of Sweden are registered. A total of 151 negligence claims (0.9%) were reported to the insurance company. Available clinical information in the company’s file of the claims was analyzed. The SWEDVASC data on AAA treatment were accessible.

Results: The number of Endovascular repair (EVAR) increased significantly, but the total number of interventions decreased. There were less claims after EVAR (0.7%) compared to open surgery (1.1%). There was an increase in avoidable injuries that were economically compensated (p = 0.02). Spinal cord ischemia and intestinal ischemia were dominating causes for claims

Conclusion: The increase in the number of avoidable injuries should have an impact on how to train and support colleagues under education and efforts to diminish the injuries are essential. To develop methods to diminish the risk for non-avoidable complications is important.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Wanhainen A, van Herzeele I, Goncalves FB, Montogu SB, Berard K, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). 2024 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67: 192–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002

2. Svensjö S, Björck M, Gürtelschmid M, DjavaniGidlund K, Hallberg A, Wanhainen A. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year old Swedish men indicating a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation 2011; 124: 1118–23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.030379

3. Venermo M, Lees T. International Vascunet validation of the SWEDVASC Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50: 802–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.021

4. Rudström H, Bergqvist D, Ahlberg J, Björck M. Insurance claims after vascular surgery in Sweden. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.026

5. Bergqvist D, Hafström L, Gustafson P. The consequencies of negligence claims in arterial surgery – an analysis of two periods with an increasing use of endovascular treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 58: 771–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.06.030

6. SWEDVASC. Yearly report 2007–2021. Stockholm: Swedish Vascular Registry.

7. Liu T, Zhao J, Sun J, Wu K, Wang W. Comparison of efficacy and safety of open surgery, hybrid surgery and endovascular repair for the treatment of thoroacoabominal aneurysms: a systematic review and net-work meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10: 1257628. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1257628

8. Jonsson CG, Mani K, Mosavi F, D'Oria M, Semenas F, Wanhainen A, Lindström D. Spinal-drain related complications after complex endovascular repair using a prophylactic automated volume-directed drainage protocol. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78: 575–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.505