Contraceptive choices and satisfaction: a cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic influences
Abstract
Introduction: Investigating factors associated with contraceptive satisfaction is important to create a basis for tailored contraceptive counseling. In this study, we aimed to explore how sociodemographic characteristics affected women’s level of satisfaction and choice of different contraceptive methods, using data collected during a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the region Örebro County, Sweden.
Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from a previously conducted RCT. Eligible participants were women aged 20–40 years who sought contraceptive counseling. All women who participated in the RCT and completed a follow-up questionnaire were included in the analysis.
Results: Between February 2015 and March 2016, 1,946, participants were enrolled in the trial, with 1,198 (61.6%) completing the 2-month follow-up questionnaire. Overall, 81.3% of women reported being ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ with their contraceptive method. Participants aged 27–40 years used long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) to a higher extent compared with those aged 20–26 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44–2.56). Older age was associated with lower satisfaction (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33–0.94).
Participants with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 more often used LARC (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24–2.28) but were also more likely to report no use of contraceptives at all (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.01–2.43) compared with BMI < 25. The level of satisfaction tended to decrease with increasing BMI. Country of birth and educational level were not associated with satisfaction.
Conclusions: The use of LARC was more common among women with BMI ≥ 25 and older women. While BMI, education, and place of birth did not affect satisfaction, women aged 27–40 reported lower satisfaction. These findings contrast with prior studies and highlight the complex sociodemographic influences on contraception experiences.
Downloads
References
2. Sittig KR, Weisman CS, Lehman E, Chuang CH. What women want: factors impacting contraceptive satisfaction in privately insured women. Womens Health Issues. 2020;30:93–7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.11.003
3. Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:1105–13. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821188ad
4. Madden T, Mullersman JL, Omvig KJ, Secura GM, Peipert JF. Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2013;88:243–9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.015
5. Rosenstock JR, Peipert JF, Madden T, Zhao Q, Secura GM. Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1298–305. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827499bd
6. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8
7. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight [cited 13 October 2023].
8. Folkhälsomyndigheten. Available from: https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/folkhalsorapportering-statistik/tolkad-rapportering/folkhalsans-utveckling/resultat/halsa/overvikt-och-fetma/ [cited 16 September 2023].
9. Kaneshiro B, Jensen JT, Carlson NE, Harvey SM, Nichols MD, Edelman AB. Body mass index and sexual behavior. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:586–92. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818425ec
10. Bajos N, Wellings K, Laborde C, Moreau C, Group CSF. Sexuality and obesity, a gender perspective: results from French national random probability survey of sexual behaviours. BMJ. 2010;340:c2573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2573
11. Sundell M, Ginstman C, Mansson A, Forslund I, Brynhildsen J. Patterns of prescription and discontinuation of contraceptives for Swedish women with obesity and normal-weight women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24:192–7. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1610873
12. Sedgh G, Singh S, Henshaw SK, Bankole A. Legal abortion worldwide in 2008: levels and recent trends. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43:188–98. doi: 10.1363/4318811
13. Emtell Iwarsson K, Larsson EC, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. Contraceptive use among migrant, second-generation migrant and non-migrant women seeking abortion care: a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in Sweden. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2019;45:118–126.
14. Hellstrom A, Gemzell Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H. Trends in use and attitudes towards contraception in Sweden: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24:154–60. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1581163
15. Envall N, Wallstrom T, Gemzell Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H. Use of contraception and attitudes towards contraceptive use in Swedish women: an internet-based nationwide survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022;27:409–17. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2094911
16. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World contraceptive use. Estimates and projections of family planning indicators 2022. Avaliable from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/data/world-contraceptive-use [cited 4 December 2023].
17. Skogsdal YRE, Karlsson JA, Cao Y, Fadl HE, Tyden TA. Contraceptive use and reproductive intentions among women requesting contraceptive counseling. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97:1349–57. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13426
18. Skogsdal Y, Fadl H, Cao Y, Karlsson J, Tyden T. An intervention in contraceptive counseling increased the knowledge about fertility and awareness of preconception health-a randomized controlled trial. Ups J Med Sci. 2019;124:203–12. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1653407
19. Yang YC, Walsh CE, Johnson MP, Belsky DW, Reason M, Curran P, et al. Life-course trajectories of body mass index from adolescence to old age: racial and educational disparities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(17): 1–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020167118
20. Steinberg JR, Marthey D, Xie L, Boudreaux M. Contraceptive method type and satisfaction, confidence in use, and switching intentions. Contraception. 2021;104:176–82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.010
21. Läkemedelsverket (Swedish Medical Products Agency). Preventivmetoder för antikonception – behandlingsrekommendation [Contraception; Treatment recommendations]. Available from: https://www.lakemedelsverket.se/sv/behandling-och-forskrivning/behandlingsrekommendationer/sok-behandlingsrekommendationer/preventivmetoder-for-antikonception--behandlingsrekommendation [cited 10 May 2023].
22. McNicholas C, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert JF. The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learned. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:635–43. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000070
23. Kohn JE, Lopez PM, Simons HR. Weight and body mass index among female contraceptive clients. Contraception. 2015;91:470–3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.006
24. Merki-Feld GS, Skouby S, Serfaty D, Lech M, Bitzer J, Crosignani PG, et al. European society of contraception statement on contraception in obese women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20:19–28. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.960561
25. Helstrom L, Odlind V, Zatterstrom C, Johansson M, Granath F, Correia N, et al. Abortion rate and contraceptive practices in immigrant and native women in Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31:405–10. doi: 10.1080/14034940210165181
26. Folkhälsomyndigheten. Nationella folkhälsoenkäten- Hälsa på lika villkor? 2016 Available from: https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/folkhalsorapportering-statistik/om-vara-datainsamlingar/nationella-folkhalsoenkaten/fakta-om-nationella-folkhalsoenkaten/ [cited 22 January 2024].
27. Kim JY, Florez M, Botto E, Belgrave X, Grace C, Getz K. The influence of socioeconomic status on individual attitudes and experience with clinical trials. Commun Med (Lond). 2024;4:172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00586-9
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Upsala Medical Society. Read the full Copyright- and Licensing Statement.
