Comparison of best corrected visual acuity estimates between a custom-made digital chart and the ETDRS chart

Zhaohua Yu

doi:10.48101/ujms.v131.13537

Zhaohua Yu Gullstrand Lab, Ophthalmology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v131.13537

Keywords: Visual acuity, digital chart, ETDRS, logMAR, clinical ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose: To compare best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurements obtained using a digital visual acuity chart with those from the gold-standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart and to assess differences in measurement variability and examination time.

Methods: Altogether 42 subjects (≥ 55 years) were examined using both charts on two separate occasions. BCVA was recorded in logMAR. Examination time was recorded. Subjects were stratified into four visual acuity classes. A nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze systematic differences and variance components.

Results: A statistically significant difference in BCVA between the charts was found, but the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference (Digital − ETDRS: −0.03 ± 0.04 logMAR) was below the 0.1 logMAR resolution threshold. No significant interaction was observed between chart type and acuity class. The digital chart significantly reduced examination time by an average of 50 sec (95% CI: ±21). Variance was highest between testing occasions compared with that between-subject and for interaction between chart type and subjects.

Conclusions: The digital chart provides clinically equivalent BCVA estimates compared to the ETDRS chart, with shorter examination time. Its use in routine clinical settings is supported.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.
Pollock A, Hazelton C, Henderson CA, Angilley J, Dhillon B, Langhorne P, et al. Interventions for age‐related visual problems in patients with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12(3):CD008390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008390.pub2

2.
Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Grusing S, Blazina I. Screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315:915–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0783

3.
Westheimer G. Scaling of visual acuity measurements. Archiv Ophthalmol. 1979;97:327–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1979.01020010173020

4.
Ricci F, Cedrone C, Cerulli L. Standardized measurement of visual acuity. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5:41–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1076/opep.5.1.41.1499

5.
Falkenstein IA, Cochran DE, Azen SP, Dustin L, Tammewar AM, Kozak I, et al. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:319–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.028

6.
Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:91–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(82)90197-0

7.
Ferris FL, Bailey I. Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:181–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30742-2

8.
Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53:740–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197611000-00006

9.
Rahimy E, Reddy S, DeCroos FC, Khan MA, Boyer DS, Gupta OP, et al. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity agreement between standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart and a handheld equivalent in eyes with rethinal pathology. Retina. 2015;35:1680–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000518

10.
Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Investig Ophthal Vis Sci. 1991;32:422–32.

11.
Carkeet A. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:529–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200107000-00017

12.
Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, Ferris FL, SanGiovanni JP, Johnson CA, et al. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:194–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01825-1

13.
Laidlaw DAH, Tailor V, Shah N, Atamian S, Harcourt C. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:241–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.121715

14.
Jolly JK, Juenemann K, Boagey H, Nadsady M, Bridge H, Maclaren RE. Validation of electronic visual acuity (EVA) measurement against standardised ETDRS charts in patients with visual field loss from inherited retinal degenerations. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2020;104:924-931. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315124

15.
Bokinni Y, Shah N, Maguire O, Laidlaw DAH. Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements. Eye. 2015;29:1085–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.94

16.
Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DAH. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device. Eye. 2003;17:701–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700496

17.
Suo L, Ke X, Zhang D, Qin X, Chen X, Hong Y, et al. Use of mobile apps for visual acuity assessment: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2022;10:e26275. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/26275

18.
Kaiser PK. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;107:311–24.

19.
Hazel CA, Elliott DB. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:788–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200212000-00011

20.
Plainis S, Kontadakis G, Feloni E, Giannakopoulou T, Tsilimbaris MK, Pallikaris IG, et al. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:174–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31827ce251